Technology clusters exploration for patent portfolio through patent abstract analysis

This study explores technology clusters through patent analysis. The aim of exploring technology clusters is to grasp competitors’ levels of sustainable research and development (R&D) and establish a sustainable strategy for entering an industry. To achieve this, we first grouped the patent documents with similar technologies by applying affinity propagation (AP) clustering, which is effective while grouping large amounts of data. Next, in order to define the technology clusters, we adopted the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) weight, which lists the terms in order of importance. We collected the patent data of Korean electric car companies from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to verify our proposed methodology. As a result, our proposed methodology presents more detailed information on the Korean electric car industry than previous studies.

[1]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Patent Management for Technology Forecasting: A Case Study of the Bio-Industry , 2012 .

[3]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Technology Forecasting using Matrix Map and Patent Clustering , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[4]  Rajesh K. Chandy,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Conversion Ability in Product Development , 2006 .

[5]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[6]  Olof Ejermo,et al.  Regional Innovation Measured by Patent Data—Does Quality Matter? , 2009 .

[7]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[8]  Yongtae Park,et al.  Development of a GTM-based patent map for identifying patent vacuums , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Richard Silberglitt,et al.  The Global Technology Revolution 2020, In-Depth Analyses: Bio/Nano/Materials/Information Trends, Drivers, Barriers, and Social Implications , 2002 .

[10]  Adolfo Guzmán-Arenas,et al.  Automatic Building of an Ontology from a Corpus of Text Documents Using Data Mining Tools , 2012 .

[11]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Examining technological innovation of Apple using patent analysis , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[12]  Samee U. Khan,et al.  A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis , 2014 .

[13]  Yu-Shan Chen,et al.  The relationship between a firm's patent quality and its market value — The case of US pharmaceutical industry , 2010 .

[14]  ParkYongtae,et al.  Development of a GTM-based patent map for identifying patent vacuums , 2012 .

[15]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[16]  Sunghae Jun,et al.  Vacant technology forecasting using new Bayesian patent clustering , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  Strategic visualisation tools for managing technological information , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[18]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach , 2009 .

[19]  Sang-Chan Park,et al.  Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[21]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .

[22]  R. Marshall 5. Multidimensional Scaling. 2nd edn. Trevor F. Cox and Michael A. A. Cox, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington DC, 2000. No. of pages: xiv + 309. Price: $79.95. ISBN 1‐58488‐094‐5 , 2002 .