No effects of mobile phone use on cortical auditory change‐detection in children: An ERP study

We investigated the effect of mobile phone use on the auditory sensory memory in children. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), P1, N2, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a, were recorded from 17 children, aged 11-12 years, in the recently developed multi-feature paradigm. This paradigm allows one to determine the neural change-detection profile consisting of several different types of acoustic changes. During the recording, an ordinary GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) mobile phone emitting 902 MHz (pulsed at 217 Hz) electromagnetic field (EMF) was placed on the ear, over the left or right temporal area (SAR(1g) = 1.14 W/kg, SAR(10g) = 0.82 W/kg, peak value = 1.21 W/kg). The EMF was either on or off in a single-blind manner. We found that a short exposure (two 6 min blocks for each side) to mobile phone EMF has no statistically significant effects on the neural change-detection profile measured with the MMN. Furthermore, the multi-feature paradigm was shown to be well suited for studies of perception accuracy and sensory memory in children. However, it should be noted that the present study only had sufficient statistical power to detect a large effect size.

[1]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Maturation of cortical sound processing as indexed by event-related potentials , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  I. Winkler,et al.  Involuntary Attention and Distractibility as Evaluated with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Temperature rise for the human head for cellular telephones and for peak SARs prescribed in safety guidelines , 2001, 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest (Cat. No.01CH37157).

[4]  Yoshikazu Ugawa,et al.  Thirty minutes mobile phone use has no short-term adverse effects on central auditory pathways , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  S. N. Hornsleth,et al.  Calculation of change in brain temperatures due to exposure to a mobile phone. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  F. Prato,et al.  Human electrophysiological and cognitive effects of exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF modulated RF and microwave fields: A review of recent studies , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  G. Mezei,et al.  Mobile phone ownership and use among school children in three Hungarian cities , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  C. Escera,et al.  Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Hsing-Yi Chen,et al.  Temperature Increase in Human Heads Due to Different Models of Cellular Phones , 2006 .

[10]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  P. Leppänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for investigating auditory discrimination and sensory memory in infants and children , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Characterisation of Energy Deposition in the Head from Cellular Phones , 1999 .

[14]  S. Geisser,et al.  An Extension of Box's Results on the Use of the $F$ Distribution in Multivariate Analysis , 1958 .

[15]  K. Alho.  Cerebral Generators of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and Its Magnetic Counterpart (MMNm) Elicited by Sound Changes , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[16]  O. Fujiwara,et al.  FDTD computation of temperature rise in the human head for portable telephones , 1999 .

[17]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[18]  Matti Laine,et al.  Electromagnetic field emitted by 902 MHz mobile phones shows no effects on children's cognitive function , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  R. Näätänen.  The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Matti Laine,et al.  Mobile phone effects on children's event-related oscillatory EEG during an auditory memory task , 2006, International journal of radiation biology.

[21]  Con Stough,et al.  Examining the effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by GSM mobile phones on human event-related potentials and performance during an auditory task , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  M Koivisto,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during a memory task , 2000, Neuroreport.

[23]  J. Schüz,et al.  Cellular telephone use among primary school children in Germany , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[24]  P Wainwright,et al.  Thermal effects of radiation from cellular telephones. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  T. Samaras,et al.  High-resolution numerical model of the middle and inner ear for a detailed analysis of radio frequency absorption , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Evaluation of multi-attribute auditory discrimination in dyslexia with the mismatch negativity , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  S. Pisa,et al.  Power absorption and temperature elevations induced in the human head by a dual-band monopole-helix antenna phone , 2001, IMS 2001.

[28]  Steven Muncer,et al.  Back from the Beach but Hanging on the Telephone? English Adolescents' Attitudes and Experiences of Mobile Phones and the Internet , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[31]  C M Krause,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic fields emitted by cellular phones on the electroencephalogram during a visual working memory task , 2000, International journal of radiation biology.

[32]  R. Näätänen,et al.  The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  H. Berger.  Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen , 1929, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[34]  Joachim Schüz,et al.  Mobile phone use and exposures in children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[35]  R. Näätänen.  Mismatch negativity: clinical research and possible applications. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[36]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  S. Pisa,et al.  Specific absorption rate and temperature increases in the head of a cellular-phone user , 2000 .

[38]  Christina M Krause,et al.  Effects of pulsed and continuous wave 902 MHz mobile phone exposure on brain oscillatory activity during cognitive processing , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[39]  V. Knott,et al.  The right profile: Mismatch negativity in schizophrenia with and without auditory hallucinations as measured by a multi-feature paradigm , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  N. Cowan.  On short and long auditory stores. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[42]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Preattentive auditory information processing under exposure to the 902 MHz GSM mobile phone electromagnetic field: A mismatch negativity (MMN) study , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[43]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials , 1982, Biological Psychology.

[44]  K. Jokela,et al.  Setup and dosimetry for exposing anaesthetised pigs in vivo to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone fields , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[45]  Matti Laine,et al.  Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during an auditory memory task: A double blind replication study , 2004, Bioelectromagnetics.

[46]  Kjell Hansson Mild,et al.  Ownership and use of wireless telephones: a population-based study of Swedish children aged 7–14 years , 2007, BMC public health.

[47]  A. W. Wood,et al.  The use of a ‘phantom scalp’ to assess the possible direct pickup of mobile phone handset emissions by electroencephalogram electrode leads , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[48]  N. Kuster,et al.  Differences in RF energy absorption in the heads of adults and children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[49]  P Ullsperger,et al.  Effects of microwaves emitted by cellular phones on human slow brain potentials. , 1998, Bioelectromagnetics.

[50]  T. Samaras,et al.  Influence of Thermophysiological Parameters on the Calculations of Temperature Rise in the Head of Mobile Phone Users , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[51]  R J Croft,et al.  The sensitivity of human event‐related potentials and reaction time to mobile phone emitted electromagnetic fields , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[52]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[53]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[54]  A. Preece,et al.  Effect of 902 MHz mobile phone transmission on cognitive function in children , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.