Inclusive online community arts: COVID and beyond COVID

ABSTRACT Inclusivity is an underlying principle of community arts, particularly for learning disabled and autistic people for whom the arts can create spaces of equity and inclusive participation. The Covid-19 pandemic required practitioners to find ways of replicating this sense of inclusivity through online delivery. This “digital turn” raised two recurring concerns. First, the accessibility and inclusivity of online activities; second, the quality of alternative digital provision. This paper examines these themes in the specific context of the Creative Doodle Book, which modelled inclusive online practice with learning disabled participants. Drawing on over 20 interviews with learning-disability focused community arts groups, the paper explores barriers to access, but also issues surrounding support and expectations. However, the focus is equally on the benefits once within an online “space”, including new skills, widening networks, the development of inclusive capital and the opportunity to enable greater agency and self-advocacy both during Covid and beyond.

[1]  C. Grile The Applied Theatre Artist: Responsivity and Expertise in Practice , 2021, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance.

[2]  P. McCallion,et al.  The impact of COVID‐19 on the social inclusion of older adults with an intellectual disability during the first wave of the pandemic in Ireland , 2021, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[3]  D. Camlin,et al.  The digital ‘turn’ in music education (editorial) , 2021, Music Education Research.

[4]  G. Watts COVID-19 and the digital divide in the UK , 2020, The Lancet Digital Health.

[5]  Kay Hepplewhite The Applied Theatre Artist , 2020 .

[6]  J. Cameron The Artist's Way: A Spiritual Path to Higher Creativity , 2019 .

[7]  Sailaja Chennat Conceptualizing Disability Inclusion , 2019, Disability Inclusion and Inclusive Education.

[8]  Santoshi Halder,et al.  Correction to: Inclusion, Equity and Access for Individuals with Disabilities , 2019, Inclusion, Equity and Access for Individuals with Disabilities.

[9]  S. Hayhoe Inclusive capital, human value and cultural access , 2018, The Routledge Handbook of Disability Arts, Culture, and Media.

[10]  Ben Fletcher-Watson,et al.  Enhancing relaxed performance: evaluating the Autism Arts Festival , 2018 .

[11]  S. Burgstahler Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities , 2015 .

[12]  M. Hargrave Theatres of Learning Disability: Good, Bad, or Plain Ugly? , 2015 .

[13]  M. Hargrave Theatres of Learning Disability , 2015 .

[14]  Jane Seale,et al.  The role of supporters in facilitating the use of technologies by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: a place for positive risk-taking? , 2014 .

[15]  Mauro Overend,et al.  Interviewing the Experts , 2014 .

[16]  C. Bishop Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship , 2012 .

[17]  E. Hall Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. , 2010, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[18]  Seth Pettie,et al.  Mind the gap , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[19]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  O. Kelly Community, art and the state : storming the citadels , 1984 .