Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures

This paper discusses the fronting of a focal constituent to a clause-initial position which, in various languages, is associated with an import of unexpectedness. We provide prosodic and syntactic evidence from Italian showing that this phenomenon has distinctive grammatical properties with respect to other instances of “focus fronting”. We argue that the fronted constituent bears narrow focus, and that the unexpectedness import conveys that the asserted proposition is less likely than one or more distinct focus alternatives (see Grosz 2011). We characterize this import as a conventional implicature, and we argue that likelihood is interpreted with respect to an informative modal base which is shared by the conversational community (the context set). We show that the unexpectedness import expressed by a speaker can be accepted or rejected by the other discourse participants: thus, it qualifies as an evaluative commitment of the speaker and, when accepted by the interlocutors, it can give rise to a shared evaluation. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.9.3 BibTeX info

[1]  V. Bianchi,et al.  Focus Fronting and its implicatures , 2015 .

[2]  Jonathan Ginzburg,et al.  The Interactive Stance , 2012 .

[3]  B. Partee.  Lexical semantics and compositionality. , 1995 .

[4]  Teresa Torres Bustamante.  Real tense and real aspect in mirativity , 2012 .

[5]  安平鎬,et al.  Evidentiality , 2018, A Grammar of Nganasan.

[6]  Teresa Torres Bustamante.  ON THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF MIRATIVITY: EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH AND ALBANIAN , 2013 .

[7]  Sarah E. Murray.  Varieties of update , 2014 .

[8]  Assertion , 2008, Practices of Reason.

[9]  A. Kratzer.  Modals and Conditionals , 2012 .

[10]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[11]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[12]  Scott Delancey,et al.  Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information , 1997 .

[13]  Tyler Peterson.  Examining the Mirative and Nonliteral Uses of Evidentials ∗ , 2010 .

[14]  P. Grosz.  On the Grammar of Optative Constructions , 2012 .

[15]  A. Kratzer.  The Notional Category of Modality , 2008 .

[16]  Noor van Leusen,et al.  Incompatibility in context: A diagnosis of correction , 2004, J. Semant..

[17]  Anne Abeillé,et al.  Two types of preposed NP in French , 2008 .

[18]  Kim B. Bruce,et al.  On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions , 2010, J. Semant..

[19]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[20]  Scott DeLancey,et al.  The mirative and evidentiality , 2001 .

[21]  Christopher Potts.  The expressive dimension , 2007 .

[22]  Giuliano Bocci,et al.  The Syntax-Prosody Interface: A Cartographic Perspective With Evidence from Italian , 2013 .

[23]  Christopher Potts.  Conventional implicature and expressive content , 2008 .

[24]  Christopher Potts,et al.  Conventional Implicatures: A Distinguished Class of Meanings , 2007 .

[25]  V. Bianchi,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian , 2012 .

[26]  Manuela Ambar.  Aspects of the Syntax of Focus in Portuguese , 1999 .

[27]  Christine A. Gunlogson.  True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English , 2003 .

[28]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[29]  T. Gonen,et al.  Questions , 1927, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[30]  Silvio Cruschina,et al.  Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections , 2012 .

[31]  Friederike Moltmann,et al.  Relative truth and the first person , 2010 .

[32]  Raffaella Paul Zanuttini,et al.  Exclamative Clauses: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface , 2003 .

[33]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  CONTRASTIVE FOCUS, GIVENNESS AND THE UNMARKED STATUS OF "DISCOURSE-NEW"* , 2008 .

[34]  K. Fintel,et al.  'Might' Made Right , 2011 .

[35]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning , 2008 .

[36]  H. Rullmann,et al.  Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St'át'imcets , 2008 .

[37]  M. Krifka.  Association with focus phrases , 2006 .

[38]  M. Squartini.  Lexical vs. grammatical evidentiality in French and Italian , 2008 .

[39]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Left peripheral focus: mismatches between syntax and information structure , 2011 .

[40]  G. Lazard.  Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? , 1999 .

[41]  Vladimir A. Plungian,et al.  The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space , 2001 .

[42]  P. Dendale,et al.  Introduction: evidentiality and related notions , 2001 .

[43]  Jessica Rett,et al.  Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts , 2011 .

[44]  Katharina Hartmann,et al.  In Place – Out of Place : Focus in Hausa , 2004 .

[45]  Sarah E. Murray,et al.  A semantic account of mirative evidentials , 2013 .

[46]  Werner Frey,et al.  Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German , 2010 .

[47]  Gilbert Lazard,et al.  On the grammaticalization of evidentiality , 2001 .

[48]  Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,et al.  The essence of mirativity , 2012 .

[49]  Elisabeth,et al.  CONTEXT DEPENDENCE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF QUESTIONS AND SUBJUNCTIVES , 2007 .

[50]  Malte Zimmermann,et al.  Contrastive Focus , 2021 .

[51]  Sarah E. Murray.  Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts , 2010 .

[52]  Peter Nathan Lasersohn,et al.  Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste* , 2005 .

[53]  Martina Faller.  Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua , 2002 .

[54]  T. Stephenson.  Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste , 2007 .

[55]  B. Cornillie.  Modality , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[56]  K. Maier.  INQUIRY , 2007 .

[57]  E. Selkirk,et al.  Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English , 2012 .

[59]  Hazel Pearson,et al.  A Judge-Free Semantics for Predicates of Personal Taste , 2013, J. Semant..

[60]  Craige Roberts.  Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .