The Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Health Care Utilization

This study sought to determine the effects on health care utilization of meaningful use (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) compared to typical use of EHRs without MU. This was a cohort study of primary care physicians in New York State (2010-2011). A total of 7 outcomes (primary care visits, specialist visits, laboratory tests, radiology tests, emergency department visits, admissions and readmissions) and 11 potential confounders were considered. The study sample included 213 physicians (50% of whom had achieved MU) and 127 353 patients. There were 17 fewer primary care visits and 61 fewer laboratory tests for every 100 patients whose physicians achieved MU, compared with patients whose physicians did not achieve MU (P < .05 for each). There were no differences for other outcomes. Achieving stage 1 MU was associated with fewer primary care visits and laboratory tests, suggesting that effects of MU are distinct from effects of typical EHR use.

[1]  Susan S Stuard,et al.  Interval Examination: Regional Transformation of Care Delivery in the Hudson Valley , 2011, Journal of general internal medicine.

[2]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Effect of Electronic Health Records on Health Care Costs: Longitudinal Comparative Evidence From Community Practices , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  The Patient-Centered Medical Home, Electronic Health Records, and Quality of Care , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Electronic Result Viewing and Quality of Care in Small Group Practices , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  Rina V. Dhopeshwarkar,et al.  Health Information Exchange and Ambulatory Quality of Care , 2012, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[7]  J. Guzmán Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata , 2013 .

[8]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  The Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records and Health Care Quality , 2015, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[9]  C. Goldzweig,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. , 2009, Health affairs.

[10]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[11]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Measuring the effects of health information technology on quality of care: a novel set of proposed metrics for electronic quality reporting. , 2009, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[12]  D. Blumenthal Launching HITECH. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  John A. Nelder,et al.  Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[14]  Alexander F. H. Low,et al.  Financial effects of health information technology: a systematic review. , 2013, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Using Diagnoses to Describe Populations and Predict Costs , 2000, Health care financing review.

[17]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[18]  Mph Rainu Kaushal MD,et al.  Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Quality of Care , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  M. Reed,et al.  Implementation of an outpatient electronic health record and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visits among patients with diabetes. , 2013, JAMA.