On parity decision trees for Fourier-sparse Boolean functions

We study parity decision trees for Boolean functions. The motivation of our study is the log-rank conjecture for XOR functions and its connection to Fourier analysis and parity decision tree complexity. Let f be a Boolean function with Fourier support S and Fourier sparsity k. 1) We prove via the probabilistic method that there exists a parity decision tree of depth O(sqrt k) that computes f. This matches the best known upper bound on the parity decision tree complexity of Boolean functions (Tsang, Wong, Xie, and Zhang, FOCS 2013). Moreover, while previous constructions (Tsang et al., FOCS 2013, Shpilka, Tal, and Volk, Comput. Complex. 2017) build the trees by carefully choosing the parities to be queried in each step, our proof shows that a naive sampling of the parities suffices. 2) We generalize the above result by showing that if the Fourier spectra of Boolean functions satisfy a natural "folding property", then the above proof can be adapted to establish existence of a tree of complexity polynomially smaller than O(sqrt k). We make a conjecture in this regard which, if true, implies that the communication complexity of an XOR function is bounded above by the fourth root of the rank of its communication matrix, improving upon the previously known upper bound of square root of rank (Tsang et al., FOCS 2013, Lovett, J. ACM. 2016). 3) It can be shown by elementary techniques that for any Boolean function f and all pairs (alpha, beta) of parities in S, there exists another pair (gamma, delta) of parities in S such that alpha + beta = gamma + delta. We show, among other results, that there must exist several gamma in F_2^n such that there are at least three pairs (alpha_1, alpha_2) of parities in S with alpha_1 + alpha_2 = gamma.

[1]  L. Babai,et al.  Theory of Computing , 2015 .

[2]  Ashley Montanaro,et al.  On the communication complexity of XOR functions , 2009, ArXiv.

[3]  Amir Shpilka,et al.  On the structure of boolean functions with small spectral norm , 2013, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[4]  Bruno Codenotti,et al.  Spectral Analysis of Boolean Functions as a Graph Eigenvalue Problem , 1999, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[5]  Avishay Tal,et al.  On the Structure of Boolean Functions with Small Spectral Norm , 2015, computational complexity.

[6]  Dave Touchette,et al.  Quantum Log-Approximate-Rank Conjecture is Also False , 2018, 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[7]  R. J. Beynon,et al.  Computers , 1985, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[8]  Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing , 2019, STOC.

[9]  Ronald de Wolf,et al.  Exponential Separation between Quantum Communication and Logarithm of Approximate Rank , 2018, 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[10]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Theory of computing: a scientific perspective , 1996, CSUR.

[11]  R. Titsworth Correlation properties of cyclic sequences , 1962 .

[12]  Arkadev Chattopadhyay,et al.  The log-approximate-rank conjecture is false , 2018, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[13]  Michael E. Saks,et al.  Lattices, mobius functions and communications complexity , 1988, [Proceedings 1988] 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[14]  Zvi Galil,et al.  Lower bounds on communication complexity , 1984, STOC '84.

[15]  Swagato Sanyal Fourier Sparsity and Dimension , 2019, Theory Comput..

[16]  Shengyu Zhang,et al.  Fourier Sparsity, Spectral Norm, and the Log-Rank Conjecture , 2013, 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[17]  R. Lathe Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[18]  Shachar Lovett,et al.  Communication is bounded by root of rank , 2013, STOC.