Application of Theory of Quantum Instruments to Psychology: Combination of Question Order Effect with Response Replicability Effect

Recently, quantum formalism started to be actively used outside of quantum physics: in psychology, decision-making, economics, finances, and social science. Human psychological behavior is characterized by a few basic effects; one of them is the question order effect (QOE). This effect was successfully modeled (Busemeyer–Wang) by representing questions A and B by Hermitian observables and mental-state transformations (back action of answering) by orthogonal projectors. However, then it was demonstrated that such representation cannot be combined with another psychological effect, known as the response replicability effect (RRE). Later, this no-go result was generalized to representation of questions and state transformations by quantum instruments of the atomic type. In light of these results, the possibility of using quantum formalism in psychology was questioned. In this paper, we show that, nevertheless, the combination of the QOE and RRE can be modeled within quantum formalism, in the framework of theory of non-atomic quantum instruments.

[1]  O. Choustova Application of Bohmian Mechanics to Dynamics of Prices of Shares: Stochastic Model of Bohm–Vigier from Properties of Price Trajectories , 2008 .

[2]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  A phenomenological operator description of interactions between populations with applications to migration , 2012, 1207.2873.

[3]  Kazuya Okamura,et al.  Measurement theory in local quantum physics , 2015, 1501.00239.

[4]  Olga V. Man'ko,et al.  Spin state tomography , 1997 .

[5]  Mathematical foundations of quantum information: Measurement and foundations , 2012, 1201.5334.

[6]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[7]  M. Sentís Quantum theory of open systems , 2002 .

[8]  Joseph P. Zbilut,et al.  A Preliminary Experimental Verification On the Possibility of Bell Inequality Violation in Mental States , 2008 .

[9]  Polina Khrennikova,et al.  Quantum dynamical modeling of competition and cooperation between political parties: The coalition and non-coalition equilibrium model , 2016 .

[10]  H. Stowell The emperor's new mind R. Penrose, Oxford University Press, New York (1989) 466 pp. $24.95 , 1990, Neuroscience.

[11]  Andrei Khrennivov,et al.  Classical and Quantum Mechanics on Information Spaces with Applications to Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 1999, quant-ph/0003016.

[12]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Physics of risk and uncertainty in quantum decision making , 2008, ArXiv.

[13]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Possibility to agree on disagree from quantum information and decision making , 2014 .

[14]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Conditional Probability and A Posteriori States in Quantum Mechanics , 1985 .

[15]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  A quantum-like model of selection behavior , 2017, 1705.08536.

[16]  Masanao Ozawa An Operational Approach to Quantum State Reduction , 1997 .

[17]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Information Biology: From Information Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics to Applications in Molecular Biology and Cognitive Psychology , 2015, Foundations of Physics.

[18]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  Quantum probability in decision making from quantum information representation of neuronal states , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Margarita A. Man'ko,et al.  New Entropic Inequalities and Hidden Correlations in Quantum Suprematism Picture of Qudit States † , 2018, Entropy.

[20]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Instability of political preferences and the role of mass media: a dynamical representation in a quantum framework , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition , 2015, Springer Netherlands.

[22]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Bohm-Bell type experiments: Classical probability approach to (no-)signaling and applications to quantum physics and psychology , 2018, 1812.10826.

[23]  Ru Zhang,et al.  Is there contextuality in behavioural and social systems? , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Matt Jones,et al.  On contextuality in behavioural data , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  Quantum Dynamics for Classical Systems: With Applications of the Number Operator , 2012 .

[26]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  M. Ozawa Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables , 1984 .

[28]  Masanao Ozawa Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements , 2003 .

[29]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum probability updating from zero priors (by-passing Cromwell’s rule) , 2017, 1705.08128.

[30]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Realization of Measurement and the Standard Quantum Limit , 2015, 1505.01083.

[31]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Classical (Local and Contextual) Probability Model for Bohm–Bell Type Experiments: No-Signaling as Independence of Random Variables , 2019, Entropy.

[32]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum Methods In Social Science: A First Course , 2017 .

[33]  Quantum State Reduction and the Quantum Bayes Principle , 1997, quant-ph/9705030.

[34]  Emmanuel M. Pothos,et al.  Quantum-like model of subjective expected utility , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Economics.

[35]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  A model of differentiation in quantum bioinformatics. , 2017, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[36]  Andrei Khrennikov Quantum-like formalism for cognitive measurements. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[37]  Concepts of conditional expectations in quantum theory , 1985 .

[38]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Conditions for Quantum Interference in Cognitive Sciences , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Andrei Khrennikov ‘Social Laser’: action amplification by stimulated emission of social energy , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[40]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[41]  Andrei Khrennikov Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena , 2000 .

[42]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Violation of contextual generalization of the Leggett–Garg inequality for recognition of ambiguous figures , 2014, 1401.2897.

[43]  John T. Lewis,et al.  An operational approach to quantum probability , 1970 .

[44]  V. I. Man'ko,et al.  Symplectic tomography as classical approach to quantum systems , 1996 .

[45]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Towards Information Lasers , 2015, Entropy.

[46]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Quantum Models for Psychological Measurements: An Unsolved Problem , 2014, PloS one.

[47]  Olga Choustova,et al.  Quantum probability and financial market , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[48]  A. Khrennikov Information Dynamics in Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 2004 .

[49]  M. Ozawa On information gain by quantum measurements of continuous observables , 1986 .

[50]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[51]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[52]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  On universality of classical probability with contextually labeled random variables , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[53]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Interpretational Questions for Quantum-Like Modeling of Social Lasing , 2018, Entropy.

[54]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[55]  Giuseppe Vitiello,et al.  DISSIPATION AND MEMORY CAPACITY IN THE QUANTUM BRAIN MODEL , 1995, quant-ph/9502006.

[56]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: The use of probability interference and other concepts , 2009 .

[57]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Selectivity in Probabilistic Causality: Where Psychology Runs Into Quantum Physics , 2011, 1110.2388.

[58]  Vladimir I. Man’ko,et al.  Positive distribution description for spin states , 1997 .

[59]  Masanao Ozawa Operations, disturbance, and simultaneous measurability , 2001 .

[60]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Quantum Probabilities as Behavioral Probabilities , 2017, Entropy.

[61]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like brain: "Interference of minds". , 2006, Bio Systems.

[62]  Emmanuel Haven Pilot-Wave Theory and Financial Option Pricing , 2005 .

[63]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum model for psychological measurements: from the projection postulate to interference of mental observables represented as positive operator valued measures , 2014, 1405.1269.

[64]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum-like model of unconscious–conscious dynamics , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[65]  Sébastien Duchêne,et al.  Quantum-like models cannot account for the conjunction fallacy , 2015 .

[66]  David W. Moore Measuring New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive , 2002 .

[67]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[68]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On the Possibility to Combine the Order Effect with Sequential Reproducibility for Quantum Measurements , 2015, 1502.00132.

[69]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[70]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[73]  Olga Al. Choustova Quantum Bohmian model for financial market , 2001 .

[74]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[75]  François Dubois,et al.  Eigenlogic: A Quantum View for Multiple-Valued and Fuzzy Systems , 2016, QI.

[76]  R. Sorkin,et al.  Testing Born’s Rule in Quantum Mechanics with a Triple Slit Experiment , 2008, 0811.2068.

[77]  Polina Khrennikova Modeling behavior of decision makers with the aid of algebra of qubit creation–annihilation operators , 2017 .

[78]  A. Zeilinger A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics , 1999, Synthese Library.

[79]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Quantum-Like Probabilistic Structure of Mental Information , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[80]  Stuart R. Hameroff,et al.  QUANTUM COHERENCE IN MICROTUBULES: A NEURAL BASIS FOR EMERGENT CONSCIOUSNESS? 1 , 1994 .