Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.

PURPOSE This study tested the validity of four motion sensors for measuring energy expenditure (EE) during moderate intensity physical activities in field and laboratory settings. We also evaluated the accuracy of the EE values for selected moderate activities listed in the 1993 Compendium of Physical Activities. METHODS A total of 81 participants (age 19-74 yr) completed selected tasks from six general categories: yardwork, housework, occupation, family care, conditioning, and recreation. Twelve individuals performed each of the 28 activities examined. During each activity, EE was measured using a portable metabolic measurement system. Participants also wore three accelerometers (Computer Science and Applications [CSA], Inc. model 7164; Caltrac; and Kenz Select 2) and the Yamax SW-701 electronic pedometer. For the CSA device, three previously developed regression equations were used to convert accelerometer scores to EE. RESULTS The mean error scores (indirect calorimetry minus device) across all activities were: CSA1, 0.97 MET; CSA2, 0.47 MET, CSA3, 0.05 MET; Caltrac, 0.83 MET; Kenz, 0.96 MET; and Yamax, 1.12 MET. The correlation coefficients between indirect calorimetry and motion sensors ranged from r = 0.33 to r = 0.62. The energy cost for power mowing and sweeping/mopping was higher than that listed in the 1993 Compendium (P < 0.05), and the cost for several household and recreational activities was lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Motion sensors tended to overpredict EE during walking. However, they underpredicted the energy cost of many other activities because of an inability to detect arm movements and external work. These findings illustrate some of the limitations of using motion sensors to predict EE in field settings.

[1]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  S. Blair,et al.  A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  D Batty,et al.  Walking and mortality in older men. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  E. Haymes,et al.  Energy expenditure estimates of the Caltrac accelerometer for running, race walking, and stepping , 1997, British journal of sports medicine.

[7]  Mark A Pereira,et al.  A collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for health-related research. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  Barbara E. Ainsworth,et al.  Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  VALIDITY OF THE GODIN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE IN ASSESSING LEISURE TIME PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 197 , 1996 .

[10]  Y Schutz,et al.  Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[13]  E. Haymes,et al.  Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  N. C. Sharp,et al.  Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1993 .

[15]  J F Sallis,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. , 1993, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  R J Shephard,et al.  Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). , 1992, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[17]  James R. Morrow,et al.  Caltrac Validity for Estimating Caloric Expenditure With Children , 1992 .

[18]  M. Mifflin,et al.  A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. , 1990, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[19]  J A Balogun,et al.  Calorimetric validation of the Caltrac accelerometer during level walking. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[21]  Edward T. Howley,et al.  Predicting Oxygen Uptake During Level Walking at Speeds of 80–130 m/min , 1985 .

[22]  M. Pollock,et al.  Practical Assessment of Body Composition. , 1985, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[23]  J. Webster,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure by a portable accelerometer. , 1983, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  Caloric cost of playing golf. , 1977, Research quarterly.

[25]  Getchell Lh Energy cost of playing golf. , 1968 .

[26]  R. Margaria,et al.  Energy cost of running. , 1963, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  J. Durnin,et al.  Human energy expenditure. , 1955, Physiological reviews.

[28]  P. F. Scholander Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples. , 1947, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  O. Bøje,et al.  Energy Production, Pulmonary Ventilatioa, and Length of Steps in Well‐trained Runners Working on a Treadmill.1 , 1944 .