Assessment of genetically modified maize MZIR098 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2017‐142)

Abstract Maize MZIR098 was developed to confer tolerance to glufosinate‐ammonium‐containing herbicides and resistance to certain coleopteran pests. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize MZIR098 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for neutral detergent fibre (NDF) in grains, which does not raise nutritional and safety concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the eCry3.1Ab, mCry3A and PAT proteins as expressed in maize MZIR098, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification would change the overall allergenicity of maize MZIR098. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize MZIR098 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize MZIR098 is as safe as the conventional counterpart and non‐GM maize reference varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize MZIR098 grains into the environment, maize MZIR098 would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MZIR098. In conclusion, the GMO Panel considers that maize MZIR098, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the non‐GM maize reference varieties tested with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

[1]  F. S. Walters,et al.  Meeting technical challenges for protein characterization and surrogate equivalence studies that resulted from insecticidal protein co-expression in maize event MZIR098 , 2019, Transgenic Research.

[2]  J. Bresson,et al.  Human dietary exposure assessment to newly expressed proteins in GM foods , 2019, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[3]  G. Kleter,et al.  Lack of adverse effects in subchronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies on the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 in Wistar Han RCC rats , 2019, Archives of Toxicology.

[4]  Julie Glanville,et al.  Explanatory note on literature searching conducted in the context of GMO applications for (renewed) market authorisation and annual post‐market environmental monitoring reports on GMOs authorised in the EU market , 2017, EFSA Supporting Publications.

[5]  Y. Devos,et al.  Assessment of genetically modified maize MZHG0JG for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2016‐133) , 2018, EFSA Journal.

[6]  Test No. 408: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents , 2018, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.

[7]  J. Weng,et al.  Non-specific activities of the major herbicide-resistance gene BAR , 2017, Nature Plants.

[8]  C. Tebbe,et al.  Explanatory note on DNA sequence similarity searches in the context of the assessment of horizontal gene transfer from plants to microorganisms , 2017 .

[9]  R. Binimelis,et al.  Teosinte in Europe – Searching for the Origin of a Novel Weed , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  K. Pascher Spread of volunteer and feral maize plants in Central Europe: recent data from Austria , 2016, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[11]  R. Herman,et al.  Rapid simulated gastric fluid digestion of in-seed/grain proteins expressed in genetically engineered crops. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  Raju Naik Vankudavath,et al.  Evaluation of Bar, Barnase, and Barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches. , 2015, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[13]  A. Chesson,et al.  Guidance on the agronomic and phenotypic characterisation of genetically modified plants , 2015 .

[14]  Najaf Allahyari Fard In Silico Allergenicity Assessment of Novel Proteins Derived form GMHR Crops , 2013, IWBBIO.

[15]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[16]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants , 2011 .

[17]  Efsa Panel on Dietetic Products Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre , 2010 .

[18]  Efsa Publication,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) , 2010 .

[19]  Gábor L. Lövei,et al.  Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making , 2010 .

[20]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants , 2010 .

[21]  Joonki Kim,et al.  Assessment of Phosphinothricin Acetyltransferase (PAT) Degradation From Transgenic Zoysiagrass Digested with Simulated Gastric Fluid (SGF) , 2010, Journal of Plant Biology.

[22]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Application (Reference EFSA-GMO-UK-2005-11) for the placing on the market of insect-resistant genetically modified maize MIR604 event, for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Seeds S.A.S on behalf of Syngenta Crop Protection AG , 2009 .

[23]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[24]  Enric Melé,et al.  Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow , 2009, Transgenic Research.

[25]  J. Pauk,et al.  Nutritional evaluation of the proteins of broad range herbicide resistant spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) lines II. Resistance to digestion of marker proteins in rat model , 2008 .

[26]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it , 2008 .

[27]  Wilfried Wackernagel,et al.  Double illegitimate recombination events integrate DNA segments through two different mechanisms during natural transformation of Acinetobacter baylyi , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[29]  J. Haegele,et al.  THE FLOW OF MAIZE POLLEN IN A DESIGNED FIELD PLOT , 2007 .

[30]  R. V. Anrooy Foods derived from modern biotechnology , 2006 .

[31]  Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer , 2002 .

[32]  Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Maize ( Zea Mays ) : Key Food and Feed Nutrients , 2002 .

[33]  F. Sherman,et al.  Nα-terminal Acetylation of Eukaryotic Proteins* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  D. Negrotto,et al.  The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation , 2000, Plant Cell Reports.