In vitro flow quantification with contrast power Doppler imaging.

To evaluate the effectiveness of contrast harmonic (power Doppler imaging) as an ultrasonic modality to quantify flow, an in vitro model of perfusion was studied using Optison, a second-generation ultrasound (US) contrast agent. The in vitro model was made of two dialysis cartridges placed parallel and allowed absolute and relative flow quantification on both tube (entry lines) and tissue (cartridges) simulations. Video intensity curves were generated using intermittent harmonic power Doppler imaging after bolus injection of contrast. Correlation between flow and different parameters extracted from time-intensity curves and previously defined as indicators of flow was established for both tissue and entry lines, for flow rates ranging from 0 to 400 mL/min. Single-compartment equations were also tested on the model. A good correlation for the tissue model was observed between absolute flow and onset time (O), time to maximal enhancement (TME), peak intensity (P), area under the curve (AUC), and maximal ascending slope (S) parameters, with a r = 0.94, 0.94, 0.91, 0.92 and 0.92, respectively. The correlation for O, TME, P and AUC parameters was r = 0.86, 0.90, 0.78 and 0.82, respectively for entry lines. The correlation for tissue model and entry line was slightly improved when comparing flow ratios with peak ratios (P1/P2) and slope ratios (S1/S2) (r = 0.95 and 0.94). Flow calculation using the gradient-relationship method also showed a good correlation (r = 0.88) with the experimental flow. The results obtained indicated that absolute and relative quantification of flow using PDI is feasible in tube and tissue models. Several clinical applications, namely in myocardial, hepatic and renal artery studies, could be derived from these results.

[1]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction. Pathophysiological background and clinical applications. , 1996, European heart journal.

[2]  M. Hori,et al.  Myocardial salvage: its assessment and prediction by the analysis of serial myocardial contrast echocardiograms in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1994, American heart journal.

[3]  P A Heidenreich,et al.  In vitro calculation of flow by use of contrast ultrasonography. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  Functional Computed Tomography , 1997 .

[5]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.

[6]  W. C. Elliott,et al.  Regional myocardial blood flow. , 1967, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[7]  A J Hindle,et al.  A perfusion phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  T. Porter,et al.  Improved myocardial contrast with second harmonic transient ultrasound response imaging in humans using intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Carson,et al.  Ultrasonic estimation of tissue perfusion: a stochastic approach. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  J M Rubin,et al.  Fractional moving blood volume: estimation with power Doppler US. , 1995, Radiology.

[11]  S Akselrod,et al.  Myocardial regional blood flow: quantitative measurement by computer analysis of contrast enhanced echocardiographic images. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.