The Natural Moon Illusion: A Multifactor Angular Account

It is argued that the failure to explain the celestial illusion results from conceptual confusion about perceived size and from disregard of the observational evidence relating to the natural moon illusion. The evidence shows that the illusion consists of a perceived angular size enlargement of horizon objects, by a factor of about 1.5–2.0 in diameter in comparison with elevated objects. Most measurements of the illusion have been made in terms of angular size, although in some proposed explanations an illusion of linear size is assumed. The magnitude of the illusion varies, particularly with the detail of the horizon scene. The illusion can be explained as the sum of several factors that affect perceived angular size: size contrast, vergence commands and eye or head position, aerial perspective, and colour. The relative contributions of these factors are assessed.

[1]  Richard Kammann,et al.  The overestimation of vertical distance and slope and its role in the moon illusion , 1967 .

[2]  H. Gruber,et al.  Moon Illusion and Emmert's Law , 1962, Science.

[3]  Tarow Indow,et al.  Multidimensional mapping of visual space with real and simulated stars , 1968 .

[4]  R. L. GREGORY.  Stereoscopic Shadow-images , 1964, Nature.

[5]  S N Roscoe,et al.  The moon illusion revisited. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  E. Boring,et al.  The Moon Illusion as a Function of Binocular Regard , 1942 .

[7]  Apparent size as a function of vertical gaze direction: new tests of an old hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  F Restle.  Moon illusion explained on the basis of relative size. , 1970, Science.

[9]  R. Over,et al.  Stimulus wavelength variation and size and distance judgements. , 1962, British journal of psychology.

[10]  F. Angell.  Notes on the Horizon Illusion: I , 1924 .

[11]  J M Sundet.  The effect of pupil size variations on the colour stereoscopic phenomenon. , 1972, Vision research.

[12]  Kotaro Suzuki.  Moon illusion simulated in complete darkness: Planetarium experiment reexamined , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  C. Plug.  The Registered Distance of the Celestial Sphere: Some Historical Cross-Cultural Data , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  L. Kaufman,et al.  The moon illusion. , 1962, Scientific American.

[15]  D. McCready,et al.  Moon illusions redescribed , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  H E Ross.  Water, fog and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[17]  Gilbert Goldstein.  Moon Illusion: An Observation , 1962, Science.

[18]  S. Coren.  The Moon Illusion: A Different View through the Legs , 1992, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  D. H. Thor,et al.  Eye elevation and visual space in monocular regard. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  W. Bevan,et al.  Color as a variable in the judgment of size. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Determinants of the Magnitude of the Moon Illusion , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  A. Pierce,et al.  L'agrandissement et la Proximite Apparents de la Lune a L'horizon. , 1906 .

[23]  A. Higashiyama.  Anisotropic perception of visual angle: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion, overconstancy of size, and the moon illusion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  P. C. Smith,et al.  Apparent Size Contrasts of Retinal Images and Size Constancy as Determinants of the Moon Illusion , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  C. Reed.  Terrestrial passage theory of the moon illusion. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[27]  E. Boring,et al.  The Apparent Size of the Moon as a Function of the Angle of Regard: Further Experiments , 1940 .

[28]  E. Boring,et al.  The Moon Illusion and the Angle of Regard , 1940 .

[29]  T. G. Hermans,et al.  The relationship of convergence and elevation changes to judgments of size. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  D. McCready.  On size, distance, and visual angle perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  The target in the celestial (Moon) illusion , 1992 .

[32]  J. O. Quantz.  The Influence of the Color of Surfaces on Our Estimation of Their Magnitude , 1895 .

[33]  Erna Schur.  Mondtäuschung und Sehgrößenkonstanz , 1926 .

[34]  J C Baird,et al.  A simple but powerful theory of the moon illusion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  L Kaufman,et al.  The Moon Illusion, I: Explanation of this phenomenon was sought through the use of artificial moons seen on the sky. , 1962, Science.

[36]  The sun illusion: Individual differences in remembered size and distance judgments , 1966 .

[37]  F. Angell.  Notes on the Horizon Illusion: II , 1932 .

[38]  S Coren,et al.  Moon illusion in pictures: a multimechanism approach. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  L. Kaufman,et al.  The Moon Illusion, II , 1962, Science.