Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.

The optimisation of image quality vs. radiation dose is an important task in medical imaging. To obtain maximum validity of the optimisation, it must be based on clinical images. Images at different dose levels can then either be obtained by collecting patient images at the different dose levels sought to investigate-including additional exposures and permission from an ethical committee-or by manipulating images to simulate different dose levels. The aim of the present work was to develop a method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. The method uses information about the detective quantum efficiency and noise power spectrum at the original and simulated dose levels to create an image containing filtered noise. When added to the original image this results in an image with noise which, in terms of frequency content, agrees with the noise present in an image collected at the simulated dose level. To increase the validity, the method takes local dose variations in the original image into account. The method was tested on a computed radiography system and was shown to produce images with noise behaviour similar to that of images actually collected at the simulated dose levels. The method can, therefore, be used to modify an image collected at one dose level so that it simulates an image of the same object collected at any lower dose level.

[1]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: introduction to the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Further investigation of the effect of phase spectrum on visual detection in structured backgrounds , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Michael Sandborg,et al.  Comparison of two methods for evaluation of image quality of lumbar spine radiographs , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  John Yorkston,et al.  Relative impact of detector noise and anatomical structure on lung nodule detection , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Method for determining the two-dimensional presampling modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Lars Gunnar Månsson.  Evaluation of radiographic procedures : investigations related to chest imaging , 1994 .

[7]  James T. Dobbins.  Image Quality Metrics for Digital Systems , 2000 .

[8]  Patrik Sund,et al.  Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography , 2004, European Radiology.

[9]  David R. Dance,et al.  How do radiographic techniques affect mass lesion detection performance in digital mammography? , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Kenneth A Fetterly,et al.  Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  F R Verdun,et al.  Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. , 1999, Medical physics.

[12]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  Anders Tingberg.  Quantifying the quality of medical x-ray images. An evaluation based on normal anatomy for lumbar spine and chest radiography. , 2000 .

[14]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  Egbert Buhr,et al.  Measurement of correlated noise in images of computed radiography systems and its influence on the detective quantum efficiency , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[17]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  E. Samei,et al.  Effects of Anatomical Structure on Signal Detection , 2000 .

[19]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Jonny Hansson,et al.  A conceptual optimisation strategy for radiography in a digital environment. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[22]  Magnus Båth,et al.  Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: part of image background acting as pure noise. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[23]  L. G. Månsson.  Methods for the Evaluation of Image Quality: A Review , 2000 .