Multistage Selection and the Financing of New Ventures

Using a random sample of 221 new Swedish ventures initiated in 1998, we examine why some new ventures are more likely than others to successfully be awarded capital from external sources. We examine venture financing as a staged selection process in which two sequential selection events systematically winnow the population of ventures and influence which ventures receive financing. For a venture to receive external financing its founders must first select it as a candidate for external funding, and then a financier must fund it. We find evidence that founders select ventures as candidates for external finance based on their perceptions of market competition, market growth, and employment growth, while financiers base funding decisions on objective verifiable indicators of venture development, such as the completion of organizing activities, marketing activities, and the level of sales of the venture. Our findings have implications for venture financing and evolutionary theories of social processes.

[1]  Ronald J. Hustedde,et al.  Factors affecting equity capital acquisition: The demand side , 1992 .

[2]  S. Venkataraman Chapter 1 The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research , 2019, Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth.

[3]  K. Boulding What is evolutionary economics? , 1991 .

[4]  Mike Wright,et al.  The syndication of venture capital investments , 2001 .

[5]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[7]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[8]  S. Shane Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[9]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Delineating a forum for business policy scholars , 1987 .

[10]  David H. Hsu What Do Entrepreneurs Pay for Venture Capital Affiliation? , 2002 .

[11]  S. Shane,et al.  Entrepreneurship As a Field of Research: A Response to Zahra and Dess, Singh, and Erikson , 2001 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[13]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Perceiving and managing business risks: differences between entrepreneurs and bankers , 1998 .

[14]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[15]  R. Berk An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. , 1983 .

[16]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Research methods for organizational studies, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[17]  Karen A. Bantel Technology-based, “adolescent” firm configurations: strategy identification, context, and performance , 1998 .

[18]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Environments and Strategies of Organization Start-Up: Effects on Early Survival , 1989 .

[19]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  The Advantages of Entry in the Growth Stage of the Product Life Cycle: An Empirical Analysis , 1999 .

[20]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation , 1993 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  Vance H. Fried,et al.  Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making , 1994 .

[23]  N. Churchill,et al.  Bank lending to new and growing enterprises , 1986 .

[24]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The venture capital cycle , 1999 .

[25]  L. Magnusson Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics , 1994 .

[26]  D. Hogan,et al.  The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black Adolescents , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Lung-fei Lee Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[28]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success , 1988 .

[29]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Research notes and communications: Characteristics distinguishing funded from unfunded business plans evaluated by venture capitalists , 1987 .

[30]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[31]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making , 1997 .

[32]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of organizations , 1996 .

[33]  W. A. Sahlman,et al.  The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations , 1990 .

[34]  W. Gartner,et al.  Exploring Start-Up Event Sequences , 1996 .

[35]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T Campbell , 1999 .

[36]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing , 1989 .

[38]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Properties of Emerging Organizations , 1988 .

[39]  Scott Shane,et al.  Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[41]  Richard A. Highfield,et al.  New business starts and economic activity: An empirical investigation , 1987 .

[42]  Timothy Bates Entrepreneur Human Capital Inputs and Small Business Longevity , 1990 .

[43]  Carl P. Simon,et al.  The Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations , 1995 .

[44]  D. Campbell Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .

[45]  A. Bhide The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses , 2000 .

[46]  A. Bhide,et al.  Bootstrap finance: the art of start-ups. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[47]  D. J. Harris,et al.  Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform , 1984 .

[48]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[49]  Jerome A. Katz Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth , 1998 .

[50]  David de Meza,et al.  The Borrower's Curse: Optimism, Finance and Entrepreneurship , 1996 .

[51]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Paul A. Gompers The Rise and Fall of Venture Capital , 1994 .

[53]  H. Blossfeld Techniques of event history modeling , 1989 .

[54]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[55]  Vicki A. Freedman,et al.  Event History Analysis , 1991 .

[56]  S. Venkataraman,et al.  The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective , 1997 .

[57]  Paul A. Gompers Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital , 1995 .

[58]  R. Langlois,et al.  What Is Evolutionary Economics , 1994 .

[59]  Harry J. Sapienza,et al.  IMPACT OF AGENCY RISKS AND TASK UNCERTAINTY ON VENTURE CAPITALIST-CEO INTERACTION , 1994 .

[60]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Corporate Social Capital and the Cost of Financial Capital: An Embeddedness Approach , 1999 .

[61]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 1988 .

[62]  H. Rao,et al.  The Demography of Corporations and Industries , 1999 .

[63]  A. V. Bruno,et al.  The entrepreneur's search for capital , 1985 .

[64]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[65]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing , 1990 .

[66]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .