Abiotic Resource Use

Abiotic resource use in life cycle assessment (LCA) deals with the environmental concerns due to the use of resources such as metals, minerals, fossil energy, nuclear energy, atmospheric resources (e.g. argon), and flow energy resources (e.g. wind energy). Land and water may also be considered as abiotic resources, but these are dealt with elsewhere in the book series in dedicated chapters (Chap. 11 Land use by Llorenc Mila i Canals and Laura de Baan and Chap. 12 Water use by Stephan Pfister). Methods that evaluate ‘abiotic resource use’ in LCA were divided in three categories: (1) Resource accounting methods, which are methods that account for the overall natural resource use along the life cycle of a product; (2) Resource depletion methods at the midpoint level, which are methods that address the scarcity of resources (and therefore damage to the area of protection Resources), but at a midpoint level; and (3) Resource depletion methods at the endpoint level, which are methods that address the scarcity of resources at an endpoint level. Numerous methods are presented in this chapter, with different concepts and approaches. However, several gaps still exist in the evaluation of abiotic resource use in LCA, and more research is needed.

[1]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[2]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Food Production and the Energy Crisis , 1973, Science.

[3]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Thermodynamic metrics for aggregation of natural resources in life cycle analysis: insight via application to some transportation fuels. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Environmental systems analysis tools – an overview , 2005 .

[5]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[6]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Ore grade decrease as life cycle impact indicator for metal scarcity: the case of copper. , 2012, Environmental Science and Technology.

[7]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Solar energy demand (SED) of commodity life cycles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Mary Stewart,et al.  A Consistent Framework for Assessing the Impacts from Resource Use - A focus on resource functionality (8 pp) , 2005 .

[10]  I. Boustead,et al.  Handbook of industrial energy analysis , 1979 .

[11]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Impacts from Resource Use - A common position paper , 2005 .

[12]  P. Chapman,et al.  Metal Resources and Energy , 1983 .

[13]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation☆ , 1994 .

[14]  W. Ingwersen,et al.  Emergy as a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicator , 2011 .

[15]  Stephan Moll,et al.  Material flow analysis, TMR and the MIPS concept: a contribution to the development of indicators for measuring changes in consumption and production patterns , 1999 .

[16]  Bhavik R. Bakshi,et al.  1,3-Propanediol from Fossils versus Biomass: A Life Cycle Evaluation of Emissions and Ecological Resources , 2009 .

[17]  A. Chapagain,et al.  Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways , 2009 .

[18]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  The anthropogenic stock extended abiotic depletion potential (AADP) as a new parameterisation to model the depletion of abiotic resources , 2011 .

[20]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Improvements to Emergy evaluations by using Life Cycle Assessment. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  The Resource Debate Needs to Continue [Stewart M, Weidema B (2005): A Consistent Framework for Assessing the Impacts from Resource Use. Int J LCA 10 (4) 240−247] , 2005 .

[22]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Development of a methodology for the environmental life-cycle assessment of products : with a case study on margarines , 1995 .

[25]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database , 2006 .

[26]  Gavin M. Mudd,et al.  The steel industry, abiotic resource depletion and life cycle assessment: a real or perceived issue? , 2011 .

[27]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Assessing resource intensity and renewability of cellulosic ethanol technologies using eco-LCA. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  B. Bakshi,et al.  Promise and problems of emergy analysis , 2004 .

[31]  M. Aldaya,et al.  The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard , 2011 .

[32]  Nobuyuki Miyazaki.  THE JEPIX INITIATIVE IN JAPAN A New Ecological Accounting System for a Better Measurement of Eco-Efficiency , 2006 .

[33]  Maria J. Welfens,et al.  MAIA : Einführung in die Material-Intensitäts-Analyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept , 1998 .

[34]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[35]  Bengt Steen.  Abiotic Resource Depletion Different perceptions of the problem with mineral deposits , 2006 .

[36]  Bengt Steen,et al.  An estimation of the cost of sustainable production of metal concentrates from the earth's crust , 2002 .

[37]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Natural resource demand of global biofuels in the Anthropocene: A review , 2012 .

[39]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[40]  A. Hoekstra.  Virtual water trade : A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade , 2003 .

[41]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[42]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Gene Bazan.  Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[44]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products , 2008 .

[45]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Thermodynamic resource indicators in LCA: a case study on the titania produced in Panzhihua city, southwest China , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.