Multiple attribute group decision-making method based on extended bipolar fuzzy MABAC approach

In this paper, we apply multiple attribute border approximation area comparison approach to multiple attribute group decision-making with bipolar fuzzy numbers (BFNs). We reconsider the notion of BFNs and propose its corresponding operational rules, score and accuracy functions. Further, we introduce two aggregation operators and develop an MADM approach based on conventional BABAC model with overall BFNs. The proposed technique is valid and accurate for considering the conflicting attributes. We analyse the proposed method by considering a numerical example for the selection of renewable energy power generation project to show the effectiveness of the developed approach. At last, we compare the developed approach with some existing operators to show its efficiency.

[1]  José Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud,et al.  Group Decision-Making Based on the VIKOR Method with Trapezoidal Bipolar Fuzzy Information , 2019, Symmetry.

[2]  Asghar Khan,et al.  A decision making approach based on multi-fuzzy bipolar soft sets , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[3]  Yun Xiong,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Petri nets for knowledge representation and acquisition considering non-cooperative behaviors , 2020, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[4]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment , 2020 .

[5]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Likelihood-Based MABAC Approach and Its Application in Selecting Hotels on a Tourism Website , 2017, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[6]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  (1805-4498) A robust aggregation operators for multi-criteria decision-making method with bipolar fuzzy soft environment , 2019 .

[7]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making approach based on SVTrN Dombi aggregation functions , 2021, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[8]  S. Anita Shanthi,et al.  The ELECTRE 1 method for multi criteria decision making under bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy soft environment , 2019, RECENT TRENDS IN PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS.

[9]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Some Dombi aggregation of Q‐rung orthopair fuzzy numbers in multiple‐attribute decision making , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[10]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Hesitant bipolar fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  Hanbin Luo,et al.  Risk Level Evaluation on Construction Project Lifecycle Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and TOPSIS , 2018, Symmetry.

[13]  M. Pal,et al.  Multiple-attribute decision making problems based on SVTNH methods , 2019, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[14]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making process based on some single-valued neutrosophic Dombi power aggregation operators , 2021, Soft Computing.

[16]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis , 2019, Computational and Applied Mathematics.

[17]  Asghar Khan,et al.  Fuzzy Parameterized Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Expert Set and Its Application in Decision Making , 2019, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst..

[18]  Surapati Pramanik,et al.  VIKOR based MAGDM Strategy with Trapezoidal Neutrosophic Numbers , 2018 .

[19]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Projection-Based MABAC Method for Patients’ Prioritization , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[20]  Pawel Ziemba,et al.  NEAT F-PROMETHEE - A new fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method based on the adjustment of mapping trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Ivan Petrovic,et al.  Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets - Theory and Applications , 1999, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[23]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under picture 2-tuple linguistic environment , 2019, Soft Computing.

[24]  Hui Gao,et al.  Dual Hesitant Bipolar Fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2018, IEEE Access.

[25]  Sanjib Biswas,et al.  Measuring performance of healthcare supply chains in India: A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods , 2020 .

[26]  Samarjit Kar,et al.  An Extension of the CODAS Approach Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set for Sustainable Material Selection in Construction Projects with Incomplete Weight Information , 2019, Symmetry.

[27]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  Extended MABAC method based on divergence measures for multi-criteria assessment of programming language with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2018, Granular Computing.

[29]  Dmitri Muravev,et al.  A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model , 2020, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[30]  G. Wei,et al.  CODAS methods for multiple attribute group decision making with interval-valued bipolar uncertain linguistic information and their application to risk assessment of Chinese enterprises’ overseas mergers and acquisitions , 2021, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[31]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2019, Soft Computing.

[32]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Application of Bipolar Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft Sets in Decision Making Problem , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl..

[33]  Jie Wang,et al.  Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment With Interval-Valued Bipolar 2-Tuple Linguistic Information , 2018, IEEE Access.

[34]  G. Wei,et al.  CPT‐TODIM method for bipolar fuzzy multi‐attribute group decision making and its application to network security service provider selection , 2021, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[35]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[36]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  MADM Method With Interval-Valued Bipolar Uncertain Linguistic Information for Evaluating the Computer Network Security , 2019, IEEE Access.

[38]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making for Selection of Green Suppliers under Bipolar Fuzzy PROMETHEE Process , 2020, Symmetry.

[39]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods , 2008 .

[40]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment , 2018, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[41]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Decision Making Approach Based on Competition Graphs and Extended TOPSIS Method under Bipolar Fuzzy Environment , 2018, Mathematical and Computational Applications.

[42]  Sanjib Biswas,et al.  A hybrid unsupervised learning and multi-criteria decision making approach for performance evaluation of Indian banks , 2019, Accounting.

[43]  Lulu Zhang,et al.  YinYang bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[44]  Peide Liu,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy power Heronian aggregation operators , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Wen-Ran Zhang,et al.  Bipolar Fuzzy Sets , 1997 .

[46]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process , 2021, Comput. Appl. Math..

[47]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision‐making , 2019, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[48]  Gui-Wu Wei,et al.  Dual hesitant bipolar fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst..

[49]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process , 2018, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[50]  Ying Han,et al.  Bipolar-Valued Rough Fuzzy Set and Its Applications to the Decision Information System , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[51]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  A dynamical hybrid method to design decision making process based on GRA approach for multiple attributes problem , 2021, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[52]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[53]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Bipolar Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[54]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Frank Choquet Bonferroni Mean Operators of Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application to Multi-criteria Decision-Making Problems , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..