A Parameter Estimation Method for Stress- Strength Model Based on Extending Markov State-Space With Variable Transition Rates

A stress-strength model usually has more than one failure mode since the component suffers at least two types of stresses, complicating the expression of the likelihood function and increasing the computational complexity of the parameter estimation for general distributions (non-exponential distributions). A phase-type distribution (also known as a PH distribution) is dense and has closure properties, which makes it suitable to reduce the computational complexity of the stress-strength model. The traditional expectation-maximization (EM) method for estimating the parameters of the PH distribution cannot be used directly when the strength changes over time since the PH distribution is a continuous-time Markov process that must satisfy the relevant properties of the infinitesimal generator in the Markov state-space. Therefore, a parameter estimation method based on extending the Markov state-space with variable transition rates for the stress-strength model is proposed. Both failure and censored samples are considered. First, the stress-strength model based on the PH distribution is briefly introduced, and the likelihood functions for different failure modes are derived. Subsequently, the principle of the method is described in detail, the derivation process of the relevant equations is provided, and the limitations of the method are discussed. The performance of the method is evaluated using two simulation cases.

[1]  M. C. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Shock models with phase type survival and shock resistance , 1981 .

[2]  Marcel F. Neuts,et al.  Matrix-geometric solutions in stochastic models - an algorithmic approach , 1982 .

[3]  T. Altiok On the Phase-Type Approximations of General Distributions , 1985 .

[4]  Harshinder Singh,et al.  Preservation of phase-type distributions under Poisson shock models , 1992, Advances in Applied Probability.

[5]  M. A. Johnson,et al.  Selecting Parameters of Phase Distributions: Combining Nonlinear Programming, Heuristics, and Erlang Distributions , 1993, INFORMS J. Comput..

[6]  M. Olsson,et al.  Estimation of phase type distributions from censored samples , 1993 .

[7]  Ren Asmussen,et al.  Fitting Phase-type Distributions via the EM Algorithm , 1996 .

[8]  Ramalingam Shanmugam,et al.  The Stress-Strength Model and Its Generalizations: Theory and Applications , 2004, Technometrics.

[9]  Mor Harchol-Balter,et al.  Closed form solutions for mapping general distributions to quasi-minimal PH distributions , 2006, Perform. Evaluation.

[10]  Delia Montoro-Cazorla,et al.  Survival Probabilities for Shock and Wear Models Governed by Phase-Type Distributions , 2007 .

[11]  William J. Stewart,et al.  Probability, Markov Chains, Queues, and Simulation: The Mathematical Basis of Performance Modeling , 2009 .

[12]  Rafael Pérez-Ocón,et al.  Shock and wear models under policy N using phase-type distributions , 2009 .

[13]  Rafael Pérez-Ocón,et al.  System availability in a shock model under preventive repair and phase-type distributions , 2010 .

[14]  Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh,et al.  Semi-Markov models for degradation-based reliability , 2010 .

[15]  M. Bladt,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of phase-type distributions , 2011 .

[16]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Reliability analysis of shock-based deterioration using phase-type distributions , 2014 .

[17]  Parviz Nasiri,et al.  Bayesian approach for the reliability parameter of power Lindley distribution , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[18]  Fatma Gül Akgül,et al.  Estimation of using Modifications of Ranked Set Sampling for Weibull Distribution , 2017 .

[19]  N. A. Mokhlis,et al.  Stress−strength reliability with general form distributions , 2017 .

[20]  Kui Cai,et al.  Optimal replacement policies for a shock model with a change point , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Y. Sarada,et al.  On a random lead time and threshold shock model using phase-type geometric processes , 2018 .

[22]  M. Xie,et al.  Reliability assessment of system under a generalized cumulative shock model , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability.

[23]  The mean remaining strength of parallel systems in a stress-strength model based on exponential distribution , 2019, Communications Faculty Of Science University of Ankara Series A1Mathematics and Statistics.

[24]  Akram Kohansal,et al.  Stress–Strength Parameter Estimation Based on Type-II Hybrid Progressive Censored Samples for a Kumaraswamy Distribution , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[25]  A. Kohansal On estimation of reliability in a multicomponent stress-strength model for a Kumaraswamy distribution based on progressively censored sample , 2019 .

[26]  M. K. Rastogi,et al.  Bayesian inference on reliability in a multicomponent stress-strength bathtub-shaped model based on record values , 2019, Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research.

[27]  Serkan Eryilmaz,et al.  Reliability and optimal replacement policy for an extreme shock model with a change point , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Long Wang,et al.  A Parameter Estimation Method of Shock Model Constructed with Phase-Type Distribution on the Condition of Interval Data , 2020 .

[29]  Shuo-Jye Wu,et al.  Reliability inference for a multicomponent stress-strength model based on Kumaraswamy distribution , 2020, J. Comput. Appl. Math..