Using Visualization Tools to Create Kriging Models

The effective use of trade space exploration requires the generation of a large number of feasible designs to permit investigation of the trade space to identify regions of interest and to understand the local tradeoffs that may exist within that region. This generation of a large number of feasible designs is often too computationally expensive to perform. The information present in a trade space can often be adequately represented with only a few points or examples, but it is difficult to interpret this information in small regions of the space with visualization tools when only a few observations are present. This work presents the use of kriging models to create surrogates to the original system analysis models and generate a large amount of surrogate designs to populate the trade space and perform trade space exploration. This work demonstrates the combination of the previously developed trade space visualization tool with new kriging model creation software. Given the graphical nature of the tool, a graphical approach to assess and update kriging approximations in regions of interest is presented. This approach allows users to leverage multi-dimensional data visualization tools to explore, understand, and identify regions of interest in the trade space. Once regions of interest have been identified, users can select points within these regions and invoke high fidelity simulation models, thereby reducing error in the surrogates.

[1]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Visual Steering Commands for Trade Space Exploration: User-Guided Sampling With Example , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[2]  Jay D. Martin,et al.  Computational Improvements to Estimating Kriging Metamodel Parameters , 2009 .

[3]  Jay D. Martin,et al.  The ARL Trade Space Visualizer: An Engineering Decision-Making Tool , 2004 .

[4]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Visual Steering Commands and Test Problems to Support Research in Trade Space Exploration , 2008 .

[5]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[6]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .

[7]  Shawn E. Gano,et al.  Update strategies for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization , 2006 .

[8]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[9]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007 .

[10]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[11]  Jaroslaw Sobieski,et al.  Integrated System-Level Optimization for Concurrent Engineering with Parametric Subsystem Modeling , 2005 .

[12]  G.M. Stump,et al.  Trade space exploration of satellite datasets using a design by shopping paradigm , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[13]  Michael James Sasena,et al.  Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with kriging approximations. , 2002 .

[14]  Jay D. Martin,et al.  A Methodology to Manage System-level Uncertainty During Conceptual Design , 2006 .

[15]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Model Validation and Error Modeling to Support Sequential Sampling , 2008, DAC 2008.

[16]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .