"Reality surgery"--a research ethics perspective on the live broadcast of surgical procedures.

In recent years, the live broadcasting of medical and surgical procedures has gained worldwide popularity. While the practice has appropriately been met with concerns for patient safety and privacy, many physicians tout the merits of real time viewing as a form of investigation, accelerating the process leading to adoption or abolition of newer techniques or technologies. This view introduces a new series of ethical considerations that need to be addressed. As such, this article considers, from a research ethics perspective, the use of live surgical procedure broadcast for investigative purposes.

[1]  T. Walter,et al.  To see for myself: informed consent and the culture of openness , 2008, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[2]  L. Kass,et al.  The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. , 1997, New republic.

[3]  J. Isenberg.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Surgical Research and the Ethics of Being First , 2003, The Journal of value inquiry.

[4]  M. Essex-Lopresti.  Operating theatre design , 1999, The Lancet.

[5]  H. Vanermen.  Live surgery should not be outlawed at national and regional cardiothoracic meetings. , 2010, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[6]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Secrecy in medical research. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Henry K. Beecher.  Ethics and Clinical Research , 2001 .

[8]  D. Rothman,et al.  The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. , 1995, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  R. Steinbrook.  Improving protection for research subjects. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Barry,et al.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences. , 1988, JAMA.

[11]  R. Sade.  Broadcast of surgical procedures as a teaching instrument in cardiothoracic surgery. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  P. Messmer,et al.  The effect of traffic patterns in the OR on surgical site infections. , 1998, AORN journal.

[13]  Bandman El.  Protection of human subjects. , 1980, JAMA.

[14]  C. Margo.  When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research , 2001, Journal of medical ethics.

[15]  Robert J. Levine,et al.  Ethics and Regulation Of Clinical Research , 1982 .

[16]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Change we can believe in: the hyper-evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents. , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  K H Ng,et al.  Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science. , 2009, Singapore medical journal.

[18]  R. Sade.  Broadcast of surgical procedures as a teaching instrument in cardiothoracic surgery. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  Didier Mutter,et al.  Digital technologies and quality improvement in cancer surgery. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  C. Markey,et al.  A correlational and experimental examination of reality television viewing and interest in cosmetic surgery. , 2010, Body image.

[21]  Shunzo Koizumi,et al.  Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  R. Kirby.  Ethics and Regulation Of Clinical Research , 1982 .

[23]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Complications of carotid stenting during live transmissions. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.