Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-Roe abortion policy.

Whether public opinion should be expected to play a role in the shaping of abortion legislation in the states is a debatable question. Representation is a difficult task, especially if legislators receive mixed cues from the public, activists, and the political parties. In this study, we find that grass-roots activism and public opinion tend to match, and both are reflected in state abortion policy. In addition, more Pro-Life policies are found in states with a tradition of conservative policies in other areas, Republican majorities in the state legislature, more Catholic residents, and fewer women legislators. These patterns hold true for a composite index of abortion policies and for the specific policy area of government funding of abortions. Slightly different patterns occur for parental consent law, though these statutes also tend to reflect general preferences on abortion and interest group activity in a state.

[1]  Clyde Wilcox,et al.  Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion And The Politics Of Abortion , 1992 .

[2]  Clyde Wilcox,et al.  Issue Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: Abortion and Post-Webster Politics , 1994, The Journal of Politics.

[3]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Constituency Influence in Congress , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Lynda W. Powell,et al.  Serious Money: Fundraising and Contributing in Presidential Nomination Campaigns , 1995 .

[5]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[6]  D. Lowery,et al.  The Density of State Interest Group Systems , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[7]  F. Hartwig,et al.  The abortion issue down ticket: The Virginia lieutenant governor's race of 1989 , 1992 .

[8]  C. Wilcox,et al.  Second Coming: The New Christian Right in Virginia Politics , 1996 .

[9]  W. Gormley.  Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System , 1986, Polity.

[10]  Bradford S. Jones,et al.  The reliability of aggregated public opinion measures , 1996 .

[11]  Christopher Wlezien.  The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending , 1995 .

[12]  David Fairbanks.  Religious Forces and "Morality" Policies in the American States , 1977 .

[13]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Do Women Legislators Matter? , 1993, American politics quarterly.

[14]  I. Sharkansky.  The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture: A Research Note , 1969, Polity.

[15]  Charles H Franklin,et al.  Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Greg D. Adams,et al.  Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution , 1997 .

[17]  Robert M. O'Brien,et al.  Estimating the Reliability of Aggregate-Level Variables Based on Individual-Level Characteristics , 1990 .

[18]  C. Mooney,et al.  Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform , 1995 .

[19]  D. Mcfarlane,et al.  Abortion politics and abortion funding policy. , 1993 .

[20]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States , 1994 .

[21]  K. Meier,et al.  Politics and Morality: The Effect of Religion on Referenda Voting , 1980 .

[22]  E. A. Cook,et al.  Catholicism and abortion attitudes in the American states: a contextual analysis. , 1993 .

[23]  D. Klingman,et al.  The "General Policy Liberalism" Factor in American State Politics , 1984 .

[24]  K. Meier,et al.  The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict , 1996, The Journal of Politics.