Effects of Likeness and Synchronicity on the Ownership Illusion over a Moving Virtual Robotic Arm and Hand

In this study we investigated body ownership over a virtual hand and arm as a function of their visual appearance (likeness) and synchronicity of visuo-tactile stimulation with a virtual electric toothbrush and a vibrotactile glove. In all conditions, participants controlled the movement of arm and fingers, maintaining synchronicity in motor-proprioceptive-visual signals. While the effects of varying likeness and temporal synchronicity of visual and haptic stimuli on the ownership illusion have both been investigated individually before, their relative contribution is still unknown. We find that likeness should be complete: making only the hand robotic reduces the subjective ownership illusion to same level as that of a full robotic arm and hand. Visuo-tactile synchronicity is not a hard prerequisite for an ownership illusion to occur: a high degree of agency with congruent motor-proprioceptive-visual cues and an arm/hand layout similar to one’s own body can be sufficiently strong to overrule incongruent visuo-tactile cues. This work is part of a larger study on the relative contribution of factors such as likeness, viewing mode, tactile stimulation and degree of agency on the body ownership illusion. The results may contribute to the enhancement of dexterous performance in remote telemanipulation tasks.

[1]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  Illusions of having small or large invisible bodies influence visual perception of object size , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Over my fake body: body ownership illusions for studying the multisensory basis of own-body perception , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[5]  B. Hommel,et al.  Body ownership and response to threat , 2015, Psychological research.

[6]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: when a robotic hand becomes one’s own , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  Antonio Frisoli,et al.  Hand and Arm Ownership Illusion through Virtual Reality Physical Interaction and Vibrotactile Stimulations , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[8]  Jumpei Arata,et al.  Robotically Enhanced Rubber Hand Illusion , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[9]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  Rafael Granja-Vazquez,et al.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands , 2018, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Critchley,et al.  Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  G. Rognini,et al.  Visuo‐tactile integration and body ownership during self‐generated action , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Peter Brugger,et al.  The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Sophie Jörg,et al.  Need a hand?: how appearance affects the virtual hand illusion , 2016, SAP.

[16]  F. Pavani,et al.  The Role of Hand Size in the Fake-Hand Illusion Paradigm , 2007, Perception.

[17]  H. Flor,et al.  Removing own-limb visual input using mixed reality (MR) produces a “telescoping” illusion in healthy individuals , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  Fotis Liarokapis,et al.  Examining the effect of body ownership in immersive virtual and augmented reality environments , 2016, The Visual Computer.

[19]  Ferran Argelaguet,et al.  The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[20]  B. Hommel,et al.  Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  C. Moore,et al.  Movement and the Rubber Hand Illusion , 2009, Perception.

[22]  Mel Slater,et al.  Human Tails: Ownership and Control of Extended Humanoid Avatars , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Ye Yuan,et al.  Is the rubber hand illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? , 2010, 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR).

[24]  B. Hommel,et al.  The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[25]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  Daniel Tan,et al.  Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  B. Hommel,et al.  The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Yifei Zhang,et al.  Dexmo: An Inexpensive and Lightweight Mechanical Exoskeleton for Motion Capture and Force Feedback in VR , 2016, CHI.

[29]  M. Slater,et al.  Measuring the Effects through Time of the Influence of Visuomotor and Visuotactile Synchronous Stimulation on a Virtual Body Ownership Illusion , 2014, Perception.

[30]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  Michiteru Kitazaki,et al.  Illusory body ownership of an invisible body interpolated between virtual hands and feet via visual-motor synchronicity , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[32]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  A Virtual Reality Full Body Illusion Improves Body Image Disturbance in Anorexia Nervosa , 2016, PloS one.

[33]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[34]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Elicits Feeling of Ownership of an Alien Hand , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  M. Tsakiris,et al.  Beyond the colour of my skin: How skin colour affects the sense of body-ownership , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  M. Slater,et al.  The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  W. IJsselsteijn,et al.  The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. , 2008, Body image.

[39]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Tele-Presence: Bringing the operator back in the loop , 2006 .

[41]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Towards a Digital Body: The Virtual Arm Illusion , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[42]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  Illusory ownership of an invisible body reduces autonomic and subjective social anxiety responses , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[43]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality , 2006, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.