A super resolution approach for spectral unmixing of remote sensing images

It is well known that coarse spatial resolution is an important factor for the occurrence of mixed pixels in remote sensing images, and conventional approaches for spectral unmixing adopt various techniques on spectral dimension only in a fixed spatial resolution. In this article, a super resolution (SR) approach for spectral unmixing is proposed, based on the assumption that increasing the spatial resolution helps to retrieve the composition of a pixel. Firstly, a remote sensing image is downscaled into an SR image using example-based kernel ridge regression (EBKRR). Secondly, the SR image is classified using supervised hard classification, and then the class map is decomposed into thematic class layers. Thirdly, the thematic class layers are upscaled into the original spatial resolution with an averaging operation, and the abundance maps are finally derived. In two simulated data-based experiments and one ground data-based experiment, this approach was compared with linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA) and artificial neural network (ANN)-based spectral unmixing methods. The accuracy assessment indicated that the SR approach outperformed LSMA and ANN under measurements of mean absolute error and absolute bias in the three experiments.

[1]  Honglei Zhu,et al.  Linear spectral unmixing assisted by probability guided and minimum residual exhaustive search for subpixel classification , 2005 .

[2]  Kwang In Kim,et al.  Single-Image Super-Resolution Using Sparse Regression and Natural Image Prior , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[4]  Yoshio Yamaguchi,et al.  Polarimetric Features of Oyster Farm Observed by AIRSAR and JERS-1 , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Hard and soft classifications by a neural network with a non-exhaustively defined set of classes , 2002 .

[6]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  ART-MMAP: a neural network approach to subpixel classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Hairong Qi,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Approach to Unsupervised Mixed-Pixel Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Example-Based Super-Resolution , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery , 1997 .

[10]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Kernel Regression for Image Processing and Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Le Wang,et al.  Sub-pixel confusion-uncertainty matrix for assessing soft classifications , 2008 .

[12]  Martin Brown,et al.  Support vector machines for optimal classification and spectral unmixing , 1999 .

[13]  D. Roberts,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping of urban land cover using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis: Manaus, Brazil , 2007 .

[14]  Xiaojun Yang,et al.  Estimating landscape imperviousness index from satellite imagery , 2006, IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett..

[15]  Sangbum Lee,et al.  Subpixel analysis of Landsat ETM/sup +/ using self-organizing map (SOM) neural networks for urban land cover characterization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Moon Gi Kang,et al.  Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  D. B. Nash,et al.  Spectral reflectance systematics for mixtures of powdered hypersthene, labradorite, and ilmenite , 1974 .

[18]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Kernel Matching Pursuit , 2002, Machine Learning.

[19]  J. Townshend,et al.  A stepwise regression tree for nonlinear approximation: Applications to estimating subpixel land cover , 2003 .

[20]  Weiguo Liu,et al.  Comparison of non-linear mixture models: sub-pixel classification , 2005 .

[21]  Manjunath V. Joshi,et al.  Single‐frame image super‐resolution using learned wavelet coefficients , 2004, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[22]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of subpixel target size for remotely sensed imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  W. Verstraeten,et al.  Nonlinear Hyperspectral Mixture Analysis for tree cover estimates in orchards , 2009 .

[24]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  The least-squares mixing models to generate fraction images derived from remote sensing multispectral data , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  A. Strahler,et al.  Artificial neural network response to mixed pixels in coarse-resolution satellite data , 1996 .

[26]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..