Different Keystrokes for Different Folks: Visualizing Crowdworker Querying Behavior

Search engine users retrieve relevant information for an information need using keyword queries. Different users may have similar information needs, but use different query terms. The resulting user query variations can provide a wealth of useful information to IR researchers. Most recently, the keystroke-level telemetry data gathered as part of the CC-News-En collection provides important insights into how users create queries for a search task, at a level of detail not possible using a normal query log. In this demo, we present an interactive tool that enables practitioners to visualize users formulating queries. Our new tool is a temporal simulation of the typing behavior of crowdworkers, grouped by information need. It provides the ability to directly compare the cognitive behavior of multiple users simultaneously, and observe how query keyword selection and ordering happens before a final query is submitted to a search engine. To demonstrate the benefit of our tool, we include a qualitative study of four different user behavior patterns which were observed in the CC-News-En collection.

[1]  Nicola Tonellotto,et al.  Multiple Query Processing via Logic Function Factoring , 2019, SIGIR.

[2]  Guido Zuccon,et al.  Systematic Review Automation Tools for End-to-End Query Formulation , 2020, SIGIR.

[3]  Rishiraj Saha Roy,et al.  Towards Query Logs for Privacy Studies: On Deriving Search Queries from Questions , 2020, ECIR.

[4]  Guido Zuccon,et al.  searchrefiner: A Query Visualisation and Understanding Tool for Systematic Reviews , 2018, CIKM.

[5]  David Maxwell,et al.  A Study of Snippet Length and Informativeness: Behaviour, Performance and User Experience , 2017, SIGIR.

[6]  Peter Bailey,et al.  UQV100: A Test Collection with Query Variability , 2016, SIGIR.

[7]  Peter Bailey,et al.  User Variability and IR System Evaluation , 2015, SIGIR.

[8]  Per Ola Kristensson,et al.  Observations on Typing from 136 Million Keystrokes , 2018, CHI 2018.

[9]  Kevin Ong,et al.  QWERTY: The Effects of Typing on Web Search Behavior , 2018, CHIIR.

[10]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Visualization support for interactive query refinement , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[11]  J. Shane Culpepper,et al.  Risk-Reward Trade-offs in Rank Fusion , 2017, ADCS.

[12]  J. Shane Culpepper,et al.  Towards Efficient and Effective Query Variant Generation , 2018, DESIRES.

[13]  J. Shane Culpepper Single Query Optimisation is the Root of All Evil , 2018, DESIRES.

[14]  Peter Bailey,et al.  Retrieval Consistency in the Presence of Query Variations , 2017, SIGIR.

[15]  J. Shane Culpepper,et al.  Boosting Search Performance Using Query Variations , 2018, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Enrique Alfonseca,et al.  Prosody Modifications for Question-Answering in Voice-Only Settings , 2018, CLEF.

[17]  J. Shane Culpepper,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Human and Automatic Query Variants , 2019, ICTIR.

[18]  Daniel McDuff,et al.  Style and Alignment in Information-Seeking Conversation , 2018, CHIIR.