A new hydraulic particle classifier: Experimental investigation and modeling

Abstract In the present work, a new particle classifier equipped with a novel symmetric quintuplet nozzle for washing stream has been introduced and evaluated experimentally. The nozzle tips has been designed in such way to create strong swirling flow, due to the induced centrifugal upward motion of wash flow. The effect of different operating variables including wash flow rate, feed flow rate, and split ratio on the performance of the classifier has been investigated. A 3-level response surface design has been applied considering the cut-size and the imperfection coefficient as the responses. Also, the regression models has been proposed according to statistical design of experiments to take into account the effect of key operating parameters on the performance of the classifier. The experimental results show that the wash flow rate is the main parameter affecting the performance of this new equipment. Furthermore, the range of the imperfection coefficient for the classifier was between 0.2 and 0.4 for water/sand as a typical system which illustrates a good classification efficiency. This new particle classifier is able to work in a wide operating window. Moreover, the particle short-circuiting has been reduced in this new design.

[1]  Hermann Nirschl,et al.  Process monitoring and control for constant separation conditions in centrifugal classification of fine particles , 2014 .

[2]  S. Kawatra,et al.  Estimating the cut (d50) size of classifiers without product particle-size measurement , 1979 .

[3]  A. Gaudin.  Principles of Mineral Dressing , 1939 .

[4]  J. Cilliers.  PARTICLE SIZE SEPARATION | Hydrocyclones for Particle Size Separation , 2000 .

[5]  M. K. Mallick,et al.  Preliminary studies on teeter bed separator for separation of manganese fines , 2013 .

[6]  Benoît Camenen,et al.  Simple and General Formula for the Settling Velocity of Particles , 2007 .

[7]  Classification of particles by centrifugal separator and analysis of the fluid behavior , 2011 .

[8]  Avimanyu Das,et al.  Prediction of separation performance of Floatex Density Separator for processing of fine coal particles , 2009 .

[9]  Shihui Xu,et al.  Changes of size, ash and density of coal particles on the column axis of a liquid–solid fluidized bed , 2013 .

[10]  Kevin P. Galvin,et al.  Applications of the Reflux Classifier in solid–liquid operations , 2004 .

[11]  Sunil Kumar Tripathy,et al.  A short review on hydraulic classification and its development in mineral industry , 2015 .

[12]  J. R. Himsworth.  Hindered settling classifiers: the by-pass particle size controller: Part 1. Operating principles , 1974 .

[13]  E. G. Kelly,et al.  Introduction to Mineral Processing , 1982 .

[14]  K. Galvin,et al.  How to elutriate particles according to their density , 2009 .

[15]  V. Gunaraj,et al.  Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes , 1999 .

[16]  B. K. Parekh,et al.  Apex water injection for improved hydrocyclone classification efficiency , 2001 .

[17]  S. K. Tripathy,et al.  Prediction of process input interactions of Floatex Density Separator performance for separating medium density particles , 2011 .

[18]  M. Sommerfeld,et al.  Multiphase Flows with Droplets and Particles , 2011 .

[19]  Elham Doroodchi,et al.  Pilot plant trial of the reflux classifier , 2002 .

[20]  B. A. Wills,et al.  Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery , 1988 .

[21]  Galal Abd El Azim Ibrahim,et al.  Controlled wash water injection to the hydrocyclone underflow , 2010 .