Septum and medial frontal cortex contribution to spatial problem-solving

An attempt was made to contrast the effects of lesions to the medial frontal cortex and septum in two spatial tasks. In the fixed-goal (FG) task, the food was located on the same table throughout testing, and the start table was randomly varied from day to day. In the variable-goal (VG) task, the start table remained constant but the food was randomly distributed on one or the other of the two remaining tables. In both tasks, normal animals performed better than frontal and septal rats whose performance, however, improved over days in the FG, but not in the VG, task. In both tasks, significant improvement within days was found in medial frontal animals, but not in septal animals. Additional analyses revealed that septal animals had a general pattern of disrupted exploration and a tendency to use a response strategy (i.e. to repeat the same response both within and between days) which decreased over days in the FG task. In contrast, medial frontal animals did not demonstrate disrupted exploration nor any response tendency. It is concluded that both septal and medial frontal cortical damage produce a common spatial working memory impairment. However, there is some evidence to suggest that this common memory impairment could result from disruption of distinct mechanisms in septal and frontal animals. It is proposed that medial frontal lesions could affect some specific mechanism related either to attentional processes or to the ability to anticipate future events, whereas septal damage would interfere with the building of comprehensive and flexible spatial memories.

[1]  P. Ellen,et al.  Septal lesions and reasoning performance in the rat. , 1973, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  H. M. Sinnamon,et al.  Unilateral lesions of the anteromedial cortex in the rat impair approach to contralateral visual cues , 1982, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  C. Rosenkilde,et al.  Functional heterogeneity of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey: a review. , 1979, Behavioral and neural biology.

[4]  A. Black,et al.  Comparison of septal and fornical lesioned rats performance on the maier three table reasoning task , 1978, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  A. Black,et al.  Visual cues fail to attenuate deficits on a spatial-integration task following septal or fornical damage , 1980 .

[6]  C. Leonard,et al.  The connections of the dorsomedial nuclei. , 1972, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[7]  H. E. Rosvold,et al.  Localization of function within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey. , 1970, Experimental neurology.

[8]  B. Kolb Some tests of response habituation in rats with discrete lesions to the orbital or medial frontal cortex. , 1974, Canadian journal of psychology.

[9]  F. Vanhaaren,et al.  Acquisition of conditional associations and operant delayed spatial response alternation: effects of lesions in the medial prefrontal cortex. , 1988 .

[10]  H. Rouanet,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN TREATMENTS IN A REPEATED‐MEASUREMENT DESIGN: ANOVA AND MULTIVARIATE METHODS , 1970 .

[11]  B. Poucet,et al.  Spatial problem solving in a dual runway task by normal and septal rats. , 1985, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  L. Swanson,et al.  A direct projection from Ammon's horn to prefrontal cortex in the rat , 1981, Brain Research.

[13]  W. Zeman The Rat Drain. A Stereotaxic Atlas , 1964 .

[14]  J. E. Kelsey,et al.  Medial septal lesions disrupt spatial mapping ability in rats. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Raymond P. Kesner,et al.  Dissociation of item and order spatial memory in rats following medial prefrontal cortex lesions , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  G. J. Thomas,et al.  Deficits for representational memory induced by septal and cortical lesions (singly and combined) in rats. , 1984, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  D. Olton,et al.  Cognitive mapping in rats: The role of the hippocampal and frontal systems in retention and reversal , 1981, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Bryan Kolb,et al.  Spatial mapping: definitive disruption by hippocampal or medial frontal cortical damage in the rat , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  R. Isaacson The Limbic System , 1974, Springer US.

[21]  R. M. Beckstead An autoradiographic examination of corticocortical and subcortical projections of the mediodorsal‐projection (prefrontal) cortex in the rat , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  B. Poucet Object exploration, habituation, and response to a spatial change in rats following septal or medial frontal cortical damage. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  R. Morris,et al.  Allocentric Spatial Learning by Hippocampectomised Rats: A Further Test of the “Spatial Mapping” and “Working Memory” Theories of Hippocampal Function , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[25]  B. Poucet,et al.  Spatial problem solving in the rat following medial frontal lesions , 1985 .

[26]  P. Ellen,et al.  Problem solving in the rat: Septal lesion effects on habituation and perseverative tendencies , 1983 .

[27]  R. Sutherland,et al.  A comparison of the contributions of the frontal and parietal association cortex to spatial localization in rats. , 1983, Behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  G. N. Brito,et al.  Recovery of delayed alternation in rats after lesions in medial frontal cortex and septum. , 1980, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[29]  B. Kolb,et al.  Comparisons of behavioral effects of hippocampal and prefrontal cortex lesions in the rat. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  P. Ellen,et al.  The use of intramaze stimuli in the attenuation of the problem-solving deficit of septal animals , 1984 .

[31]  R. Church,et al.  Attention and the frontal cortex as examined by simultaneous temporal processing , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  S. Finger,et al.  Large and small medial frontal cortex lesions and spatial performance of the rat , 1987, Brain Research Bulletin.

[33]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[34]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Contributions of cingulate cortex to two forms of spatial learning and memory , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  Bryan Kolb,et al.  Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: A comparative review , 1984, Brain Research Reviews.

[36]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[37]  H. Okaichi Performance and dominant strategies on place and cue tasks following hippocampal lesions in rats , 1987, Psychobiology.