Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part II. Cervical spine

A new radiographic grading system for a more objective assessment of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration has been described and tested in Part I of this study. The aim of the present Part II of the study was to adapt this system to the cervical spine, and to test it for validity and interobserver agreement. Some modifications of the grading system described in Part I were necessary to make it applicable to the cervical spine. Its basic structure, however, stayed untouched. The three variables “Height Loss”, “Osteophyte Formation” and “Diffuse Sclerosis” first have to be graded individually. Then, the “Overall Degree of Degeneration” is assigned on a four-point scale from 0 (no degeneration) to 3 (severe degeneration). For validation, the radiographic degrees of degeneration of 28 cervical discs were compared to the respective macroscopic ones, which were defined as “real” degrees of degeneration. The interobserver agreement was determined between one experienced and one unexperienced observer using the radiographs of 57 cervical discs. Quadratic weighted Kappa coefficients (κ) with 95% confidence limits (95% CL) were used for statistical evaluation. The validation of the new version of the radiographic grading system showed a moderate agreement with the “real”, macroscopic overall degree of degeneration (κ=0.599, 95% CL 0.421–0.786). In 64% of all discs the “real” overall degree of degeneration was underestimated but never overestimated. This underestimation, however, was much less pronounced and the Kappa coefficients were significantly higher for the three variables: Height Loss, Osteophyte Formation, and Diffuse Sclerosis separately. The agreement between the radiographic ratings of the experienced and the unexperienced observer was substantial for the overall degree of degeneration (κ=0.688, 95% CL 0.580–0.796), almost perfect for the variable, Height Loss, moderate for Osteophyte Formation and fair for Diffuse Sclerosis. In conclusion, we believe that the new version of the radiographic grading system is a sufficiently valid and reliable tool to quantify the degree of degeneration of individual cervical intervertebral discs. In comparison to the version for the lumbar spine described in Part I, however, a slightly higher tendency to underestimate the “real” overall degree of degeneration and somewhat higher interobserver differences have to be expected.

[1]  The pathology of articular and spinal diseases , 1949 .

[2]  H. Wilke,et al.  Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[3]  H. Paajanen,et al.  Age-related MRI changes at 0.1 T in cervical discs in asymptomatic subjects , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[4]  C. Silberstein The Evolution of Degenerative Changes in the Cervical Spine and an Investigation into the “Joints of Luschka”* , 1965, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  B. Flannigan,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disc Degeneration: Correlation with Discography , 1987, Spine.

[6]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Vertebral height, disc height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Rheumatism in miners. II. X-ray study. , 1952, British journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  M Kormano,et al.  Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. , 1991, Spine.

[9]  Z. Friedenberg,et al.  DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE OF THE CERVICAL SPINE. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[11]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[13]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[14]  Ken Yong-Hing,et al.  Apophysial Joint Degeneration, Disc Degeneration, and Sagittal Curve of the Cervical Spine: Can They Be Measured Reliably on Radiographs? , 1997, Spine.

[15]  K. Schellhas,et al.  Cervical Discogenic Pain: Prospective Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Discography in Asymptomatic Subjects and Pain Sufferers , 1996, Spine.

[16]  G B Andersson,et al.  The Effect of Disc Degeneration and Facet Joint Osteoarthritis on the Segmental Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 2000, Spine.

[17]  Keita Ito,et al.  Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[18]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , 2001, Spine.