Competition in collaborative clothing: a qualitative case study of influences on collaborative quality improvement in the ICU

Background Multiorganisational quality improvement (QI) collaborative networks are promoted for improving quality within healthcare. Recently, several large-scale QI initiatives have been conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) environment with successful quantitative results. However, the mechanisms through which such networks lead to QI success remain uncertain. We aim to understand ICU staff perspectives on collaborative QI based on involvement in a multiorganisational improvement network and hypothesise about theoretical constructs that might explain the effect of collaboration in such networks. Methods Qualitative study using a modified grounded theory approach. Key informant interviews were conducted with staff from 12 community hospital ICUs that participated in a cluster randomized control trial (RCT) of a QI intervention using a collaborative approach between 2006 and 2008. Data analysis followed the standard procedure for grounded theory using constant comparative methodology. Results The collaborative network was perceived to promote increased intrateam cooperation over interorganisational cooperation, but friendly competition with other ICUs appeared to be a prominent driver of behaviour change. Bedsides, clinicians reported that belonging to a collaborative network provided recognition for the high-quality patient care that they already provided. However, the existing communication structure was perceived to be ineffective for staff engagement since it was based on a hierarchical approach to knowledge transfer and project awareness. Conclusions QI collaborative networks may promote behaviour change by improving intrateam communication, fostering competition with other institutions, and increasing recognition for providing high-quality care. Other commonly held assumptions about their potential impact, for instance, increasing interorganisational legitimisation, communication and collaboration, may be less important.

[1]  Mark Mikkelsen,et al.  Underuse of lung protective ventilation: Analysis of potential factors to explain physician behavior* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[2]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[3]  H. Bernard.  Research methods in anthropology : qualitative and quantitative methods , 2002 .

[4]  J. LoGerfo.  Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Volume I: The Definitions of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment , 1981 .

[5]  B. Glaser.  Doing grounded theory : issues and discussions , 1998 .

[6]  Peter Bauer,et al.  Variability in outcome and resource use in intensive care units , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  D. Mehr,et al.  Challenges of using quality improvement methods in nursing homes that "need improvement". , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[8]  Theodore Panitz,et al.  A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning , 2006 .

[9]  Y Mlynek.  [Quality and/or safety of health care]. , 1998, Lakartidningen.

[10]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[11]  Kira Leeb,et al.  Intensive care in Canada. , 2006, Healthcare quarterly.

[12]  Richard Beale,et al.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis , 2010, Intensive Care Medicine.

[13]  The Diffusion of Medical Innovations: An Applied Network Analysis.Mary L. Fennell , Richard B. Warnecke , 1989 .

[14]  K. Walshe.  Understanding what works--and why--in quality improvement: the need for theory-driven evaluation. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[15]  S Cretin,et al.  Quality collaboratives: lessons from research , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[16]  B. Hales,et al.  A multifaceted intervention for quality improvement in a network of intensive care units: a cluster randomized trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[17]  Merrick Zwarenstein,et al.  An innovative telemedicine knowledge translation program to improve quality of care in intensive care units: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial. , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[18]  C D Naylor,et al.  Variation in Hospital Length of Stay for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Ontario, Canada , 1994, Medical care.

[19]  Robbert Huijsman,et al.  Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J Lomas,et al.  Evaluating the Message: The Relationship Between Compliance Rate and the Subject of a Practice Guideline , 1994, Medical care.

[21]  Karla Hemming,et al.  Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  G. Naglie,et al.  The proportion of variation in perioperative transfusion decisions in Canada attributable to the hospital , 2007, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[23]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[24]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  A. Parry.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[26]  D. R. Snydman.  An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU , 2007 .

[27]  S. Leatherman.  Optimizing quality collaboratives , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[28]  M. Chassin,et al.  Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. , 2002, Health affairs.

[29]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[30]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Interventions to reduce mortality among patients treated in intensive care units. , 2004, Journal of critical care.

[31]  N. Denzin,et al.  The discipline and practice of qualitative research [Introduction]. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. , 2000 .

[32]  C. Huxham,et al.  Introducing Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Inter‐organizational Effectiveness through Meta‐strategy , 1992 .

[33]  D. Cook,et al.  A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock , 2007, Critical care.

[34]  Susan Michie,et al.  Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[35]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. , 1995, JAMA.