Conspicuous Consumption: Is That All Bad? Investigating the Alternative Paradigm

Effort in studying the phenomenon of conspicuous consumption can be adequately justified by the concept's near universality and timelessness. The Theory of Veblen presents conspicuousness as a purposive conduct in which status considerations predominate. His opinion regarding individuals' efforts “to excel in pecuniary standing” indicates his positioning of conspicuous consumption as consumers' deliberate, conscious activity to achieve the objective of status enhancement. Our everyday experience suggests that the nature of conspicuous consumption (CC) is going through a change, which remains largely unaddressed by the extant literature (for details see, Chaudhuri and Majumdar, 2006). This calls for a closer investigation of the dynamics of a more contemporary perspective of CC and the present paper takes an attempt at the same. For long, in modern societies where ‘order’ is of supreme importance, CC has been considered as a ‘sinful,’ ‘wasted’ expense that delivers no value. Possibly because of this, lavish expenditure was branded wasteful as the practice symbolized exception (Mason, 1981) or “disorder.” However, with evolving ideologies of postmodernism, consumption also gradually moved to the symbolic realm. This symbolic consumption helps the consumer to express his⁄her self and achieve a sense of continuity and identity. By adopting abstract interpretations and ascribing complex cultural meaning to products, those with “higher” taste but less money would aim to compete with those with money but no matching taste. The cultural ‘elite,’ thus, can make even a mundane or an easily affordable product to express and exhibit their exclusive taste, by sophisticated, in-depth appreciation and appropriate communication of these ‘taste-symbols’ which, by design, remain distinct from ‘status-symbols’. Based on the above discussion, the paper proposes an alternative conceptualization of the conspicuous consumption construct and also discusses the marketing implications.

[1]  Richard Elliott,et al.  Exploring the Symbolic Meaning of Brands , 1994 .

[2]  Mark S. Ligas,et al.  The Process of Negotiating Brand Meaning: a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1999 .

[3]  Dong Hwan Lee Symbolic Interactionism: Some Implications For Consumer Self-Concept and Product Symbolism Research , 1990 .

[4]  E. Turner The shocking history of advertising , 1952 .

[5]  Andrew B. Trigg,et al.  Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption , 2001 .

[6]  Sitanath Majumdar,et al.  Of Diamonds and Desires: Understanding Conspicuous Consumption from a Contemporary Marketing Perspective , 2006 .

[7]  R. Mason Conspicuous Consumption: A Study of Exceptional Consumer Behaviour , 1981 .

[8]  Jean Baudrillard,et al.  3 For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign , 1980, Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings.

[9]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[10]  D. Holt Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption , 1998 .

[11]  Mark Gottdiener,et al.  The Mirror of Production , 2020 .

[12]  Fredric Jameson,et al.  Postmodernism and Consumer Society , 2004 .

[13]  Richard Elliott,et al.  Consumption and the Symbolic Project of the Self , 1998 .

[14]  S. Worchel,et al.  Psychology of intergroup relations , 1986 .

[15]  P. Hirsch Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  When Both Similarities and Dissimilarities Matter: Extending the Concept of Relational Demography , 2002 .

[17]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel? , 1992 .

[18]  B. Joseph Pine,et al.  The Experience Economy , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation.

[19]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[20]  Roger Mason Conspicuous consumption and the positional economy: policy and prescription since 1970 , 2000 .

[21]  Larry Percy,et al.  A better advertising planning grid. , 1991 .

[22]  P. Baran The Theory of the Leisure Class , 1957 .

[23]  Matthew J. Hornsey,et al.  Intergroup Similarity and Subgroup Relations: Some Implications for Assimilation , 2000 .

[24]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  Marketing in a postmodern world , 1995 .

[25]  Eva M. Hyatt Consumer Stereotyping: the Cognitive Bases of the Social Symbolism of Products , 1992 .

[26]  Stuart Ewen,et al.  All Consuming Images: The Politics Of Style In Contemporary Culture , 1990 .

[27]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[28]  Theo M.M. Verhallen,et al.  Unavailability and the evaluation of goods , 1995 .

[29]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[30]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Consumer behavior : basic findings and management implications , 1979 .

[31]  M. Lynn Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature , 1991 .

[32]  J. Galbraith The Affluent Society , 1958 .

[33]  Grant Mccracken The history of consumption: A literature review and consumer guide , 1987 .