论文信息 - The point of normative models in judgment and decision making - 字舞流文

The point of normative models in judgment and decision making

In this comment, I shall try to summarize arguments that I have made before (Baron, 1985, 1994, 2004, 2006, 2008). These arguments are my attempt to state the standard view in the field of judgment and decision making (JDM).

Jonathan Baron | J. Baron

[1] George L. Parrott,et al. Production and judgment of solutions to five problems. , 1968 .

[2] Anthony N. S. Freeling. A philosophical basis for decision aiding , 1984 .

[3] J. Matthews. The Mind's Best Work , 1985 .

[4] J. Baron. Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[5] Gordon Miller,et al. Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions , 1990 .

[6] J. Baron. Thinking about Consequences , 1990 .

[7] Jonathan Baron,et al. Nonconsequentialist decisions. Commentaries. Author's reply , 1994 .

[8] Stuart J. Russell. Rationality and Intelligence , 1995, IJCAI.

[9] Kenneth R. Hammond,et al. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[10] Nigel Harvey,et al. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[11] J. Baron. Thinking and deciding, 4th ed. , 2008 .

[12] J. Baron. Normative Models of Judgment and Decision Making , 2008 .

[13] Philip T. Dunwoody. Introduction to the special issue: Coherence and correspondence in judgment and decision making , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[14] David V. Budescu,et al. Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.