Repeat Revascularization After Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Evaluation of Staged, Target Lesion, and Other Unplanned Revascularization Procedures During the First Year

Background—Although drug-eluting stents and intensive secondary prevention have contributed to improved outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), repeat revascularization remains relatively common in contemporary practice. We used data from the multicenter Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events registry to evaluate the relative frequency and timing of staged revascularization, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and other nontarget revascularization during the first year after contemporary PCI. Methods and Results—Patients with staged revascularization, TLR, and other unplanned procedures (elsewhere in the target vessel or in other coronary arteries) were evaluated in time-dependent models using Kaplan-Meier life-table estimation. Predictors of TLR and unplanned revascularization at nontarget sites were identified using logistic regression. Between July 2004 to June 2007, 10 144 patients undergoing PCI were enrolled at 55 US hospitals, of whom 86% were treated with at least 1 drug-eluting stent. Twelve percent required repeat revascularization within the first year (3% staged; 9% unplanned). More than 75% of staged revascularizations were performed <30 days after index PCI, although there was significant variation in this practice across hospitals (range, 0%–54%). TLR occurred in 4.5% of patients, with higher hazard rates between 2 to 9 months after PCI, whereas the risk of unplanned non-TLR (4.4% cumulative incidence) was constant over time. Conclusions—Among unselected patients undergoing PCI in the drug-eluting stent era, the incidence of repeat revascularization at 1 year is ≈12%. Among unplanned procedures, only half are performed for TLR. To achieve further improvements in PCI outcomes, future efforts should concentrate as much on identifying ischemia-producing lesions and intensifying secondary prevention therapies as on the prevention of restenosis.

[1]  J. Klein,et al.  Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 1997 .

[2]  J. Marco,et al.  Impact of restenosis and disease progression on clinical outcome after multivessel stenting in diabetic patients , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  H. Barnhart,et al.  Prediction of native coronary artery disease progression following PTCA or CABG in the Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial. , 2003, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[4]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Relationship Between Cardiovascular Risk as Predicted by Established Risk Scores Versus Plaque Progression as Measured by Serial Intravascular Ultrasound in Left Main Coronary Arteries , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  D. Baim,et al.  Beyond Restenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes From Second-Generation Coronary Stent Trials , 2004, Circulation.

[7]  S. Bergmann,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging following percutaneous coronary intervention: the importance of restenosis, disease progression, and directed reintervention. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  C. W. Barth,et al.  Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, American heart journal.

[9]  David J Cohen,et al.  Design of a registry to characterize "real-world" outcomes of percutaneous coronary revascularization in the drug-eluting stent era. , 2005, American heart journal.

[10]  W. Laskey,et al.  Clinical Progression of Incidental, Asymptomatic Lesions Discovered During Culprit Vessel Coronary Intervention , 2005, Circulation.

[11]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  On- versus off-label use of drug-eluting coronary stents in clinical practice (report from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry [NCDR]). , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Hong,et al.  Safety of single versus multi-vessel angioplasty for patients with acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary artery disease: report from the New York State Angioplasty Registry , 2006, Coronary artery disease.

[13]  David O. Williams,et al.  Outcomes and complications associated with off-label and untested use of drug-eluting stents. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  Ralph D'Agostino,et al.  Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Granada,et al.  Clinical outcomes and stent thrombosis following off-label use of drug-eluting stents. , 2007, JAMA.

[16]  Brett G. Sylvia,et al.  Differential outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: comparing on-label versus off-label patients in the ‘real world’ , 2008, Coronary artery disease.

[17]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report. , 2008, American heart journal.

[18]  R. Wilensky,et al.  A comparison of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for off-label indications. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Assessment on the Prevention of Progression by Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerosis in diabetes patients with Cardiovascular History (APPROACH): study design and baseline characteristics. , 2008, American heart journal.

[20]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Biomarker analysis by fluorokine multianalyte profiling distinguishes patients requiring intervention from patients with long-term quiescent coronary artery disease: a potential approach to identify atherosclerotic disease progression. , 2008, American heart journal.

[21]  D. Cohen,et al.  Temporal Changes in Coronary Revascularization Procedures, Outcomes, and Costs in the Bare-Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Eras: Results From the US Medicare Program , 2009, Circulation.

[22]  V. Novack,et al.  Impact of target lesion and nontarget lesion cardiac events on 5-year clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting or bare-metal stenting. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[23]  M. Leon,et al.  Late clinical events after drug-eluting stents: the interplay between stent-related and natural history-driven events. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[24]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E. Hannan,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal Stents: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies , 2009, Circulation.

[26]  D. Wagner,et al.  Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  J. Fajadet,et al.  Impact of atherosclerotic disease progression on mid-term clinical outcome in diabetic patients in the drug-eluting stent era. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[28]  G. Lemesle,et al.  Incidence, predictors, and outcome of new, subsequent lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with myocardial infarction. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[30]  Christopher P Cannon,et al.  Safety of anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Messenger,et al.  Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol--United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-200. , 2011, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[33]  Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report , 2022 .

[34]  Abigail Shefer,et al.  Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule: United States, 2011* , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[35]  Deborah A. Adams,et al.  Summary of Notifiable Diseases - United States, 2011. , 2013, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.