Perception of classroom climate, use of WebCT, and academic achievement

THE CURRENT INVESTIGATION sought to understand the relationships between college student perception of classroom climate, use of WebCT, and academic achievement. Fifty-three college students provided three categories of predictor and criterion measures: (1) rating scale responses that assessed perception of seven dimensions of classroom climate, (2) four metrics of use of WebCT, and (3) four measures of academic achievement. Results of stepwise regression analyses revealed that dimensions of classroom climate were useful in predicting student achievement and use of WebCT, but in ways that appear unique to hybrid learning environments. Results of backward elimination regression analyses suggested that student use of WebCT was predictive of academic achievement, but in ways that appear unique to hybrid learning environments.

[1]  Sarah Giersch,et al.  Why Plan for E-Learning? , 2003 .

[2]  S. Pyke,et al.  A Scale To Assess Student Perceptions of Academic Climates. , 2000 .

[3]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[4]  Albert Pilot,et al.  Using a virtual learning environment in collaborative learning: Criteria for success , 2003 .

[5]  Scott A. Myers,et al.  Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom: Effects on student perceptions of climate, apprehension, and state motivation , 2001 .

[6]  Jillianne Code,et al.  Online discussion and college student learning: toward a model of influence , 2005 .

[7]  Bonnie Burns,et al.  Changing the Classroom Climate with Literature Circles. , 1998 .

[8]  Ghazi Ghaith,et al.  The relationship between forms of instruction, achievement and perceptions of classroom climate , 2003 .

[9]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Attitude Toward Instructional Technology Following Required Versus Optional WebCT Usage , 2005 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Social Interdependence and Perceived Academic and Personal Support in the Classroom , 1983 .

[11]  Theresa J. B. Kline,et al.  Cooperativeness and Competitiveness: Dimensionality and Gender Specificity of the Classroom Life Instrument , 1995 .

[12]  Adel T. Al-Bataineh,et al.  CHALLENGES, ADVANTAGES, AND DISADVANTAGES OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE CLASSROOM , 2003 .

[13]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Ensuring quality E‐Learning: creating engaging tasks , 2003 .

[14]  P. Fassinger,et al.  Understanding Classroom Interaction: Students' and Professors' Contributions to Students' Silence , 1995 .

[15]  Geoffrey D. Borman,et al.  COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM AND STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  Elizabeth J. Allan,et al.  Chilly Classrooms for Female Undergraduate Students at a Research University: A Question of Method?. , 2003 .

[17]  Daniel W. Salter,et al.  Exploring the "Chilly Classroom" Phenomenon as Interactions Between Psychological and Environmental Types , 2003 .

[18]  Jennifer Curtin,et al.  WebCT and online tutorials: New possibilities for student interaction , 2002 .

[19]  Harold L. Miller The New York City Public Schools Integrated Learning Systems Project: Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation. , 1997 .

[20]  Sallie Joachim Accentuate the Positive: Improving the Classroom Climate in Developmental Classes. , 2002 .

[21]  Christoph von Rhöneck,et al.  Learning in basic electricity: how do motivation, cognitive and classroom climate factors influence achievement in physics? , 1998 .

[22]  Margaret Kendall,et al.  Teaching online to campus-based students: The experience of using WebCT for the community information module at Manchester Metropolitan University , 2001, Educ. Inf..

[23]  G. Diekhoff,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACADEMIC DISHONESTY AND COLLEGE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT , 1999 .

[24]  Maureen E. Wilson,et al.  The Sociology of the Classroom and Its Influence on Student Learning , 2002 .

[25]  M. A. Sartori,et al.  Classroom Climate, Teacher Control Behavior, and Student Self-Control: Urban Public and Military High Schools Compared. , 1999 .

[26]  C. Colbeck,et al.  Grouping in the Dark , 2000 .