Defining sustainability of plantation forests through identification of site quality indicators influencing productivity—A national view for New Zealand

Abstract New Zealand is committed to developing sustainable forest management practices as evidenced through Government involvement in international forestry agreements such as the Montreal Process, and the forestry sector's adoption of forest certification mechanisms. In support of this commitment, it has been identified that there is little quantitative evidence of the interactions of plantation forestry on site quality and long-term site productivity. To address this issue, a nationwide study of site quality was initiated at 35 key sites covering the range of edaphic and environmental conditions representing the productivity envelope for New Zealand plantation forests. At each location, within the productivity envelope, eight short-term site quality plots were planted at a very high stand density (40,000 stems ha−1) to rapidly identify key soil indicators of growth which may be useful for determining site sustainability. In addition, a permanent sample plot was established by planting seedlings at conventional stem densities (500–1100 stems ha−1). At each site, a factorial design was applied with the following three factors: species (Pinus radiata and Cupressus lusitanica), fertiliser (no fertiliser and nutrients supplied in excess of crop demands) and disturbance (low and high disturbances). After two years of increment, initial analyses are presented which partition treatment and site effects on increment and identify key soil properties that influence increment of the two species. Volume increment over the two-year period was most strongly influenced by site, ranging 50-fold and 15-fold across sites for C. lusitanica and P. radiata, respectively. For the treatments, species accounted for most of the variance in increment, with mean volume increment across all sites of P. radiata significantly exceeding that of C. lusitanica by 56%. Fertilisation also significantly influenced volume increment inducing mean gains of 30%. Disturbance had a significant, but comparatively weak effect, reducing mean volume increment by 9%. After correction had been made for environment (temperature and rainfall), soil properties that were most strongly related to volume increment for both species included CN ratio, total soil nitrogen, total soil phosphorus, organic phosphorus and depth of the A horizon. When soil properties were included in combination, the best predictive models of volume increment formulated for both species included rainfall, temperature, the product of total soil nitrogen and total soil phosphorus and depth of the A horizon.

[1]  A. Merino,et al.  Soil fertility rehabilitation in young Pinus radiata D. Don. plantations from northern Spain after intensive site preparation , 1999 .

[2]  B. Richardson,et al.  The role of forest productivity in defining the sustainability of plantation forests in New Zealand , 1999 .

[3]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Splines — more than just a smooth interpolator , 1994 .

[4]  H. Margolis,et al.  INTENSIVE SILVICULTURAL TREATMENT : IMPACTS ON SOIL FERTILITY AND PLANTED CONIFER RESPONSE , 1993 .

[5]  Henry A. Froehlich Soil compaction from logging equipment: Effects on growth of young ponderosa pine , 1979 .

[6]  G. Page Quantitative evaluation of site potential for Spruce and Fir in Newfoundland. , 1976 .

[7]  A. Hewitt New Zealand soil classification. , 1993 .

[8]  W. J. Dyck,et al.  Impacts of Forest Harvesting on Long-Term Site Productivity , 1994, Springer Netherlands.

[9]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Forest stand dynamics and similarity theory , 2003 .

[10]  Agustín Merino,et al.  Soil properties in a hilly area following different harvesting management practices , 1998 .

[11]  James A. Burger,et al.  A Review of Chemical and Physical Properties as Indicators of Forest Soil Quality: Challenges and Opportunities , 2000 .

[12]  R. Meldahl,et al.  Surface Soil Removal and Herbicide Treatment: Effects on Soil Properties and Loblolly Pine Early Growth 1 , 1985 .

[13]  J. Pérez‐Moreno,et al.  Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems - a journey towards relevance? , 2003, The New phytologist.

[14]  M. A. Rab Soil physical and hydrological properties following logging and slash burning in the Eucalyptus regnans forest of southeastern Australia , 1996 .

[15]  R. Sands,et al.  Compaction of forest soils. A review , 1980 .

[16]  J. Leathwick,et al.  Climate Surfaces for New Zealand , 2002 .

[17]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Soil Productivity Index: Predictions of Site Quality for White Spruce Plantations , 1991 .

[18]  A. R. Gibson,et al.  PREDICTING PINUS RADIATA SITE INDEX FROM ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES , 1984 .

[19]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Using miniature-scale plantations as experimental tools for assessing sustainability issues , 2003 .

[20]  R. Miller,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY CHANGE AS PROVIDED BY FIELD TRIALS , 1994 .

[21]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[22]  G. Mroz,et al.  Soil nutrient changes following whole tree harvesting on three northern hardwood sites , 1985 .

[23]  L. Blakemore Methods for chemical analysis of soils , 1972 .

[24]  B. Richardson,et al.  UTILITY OF "A" HORIZON SOIL CHARACTERISTICS TO SEPARATE PEDOLOGICAL GROUPINGS, AND THEIR INFLUENCE WITH CLIMATIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC VARIABLES ON PINUS RADIATA HEIGHT GROWTH , 2002 .

[25]  Carl C. Trettin,et al.  Soil quality assessment in domesticated forests – a southern pine example , 1999 .