Thematic fame and melodic originality in classical music: A multivariate computer‐content analysis1

In order to understand the foundation of eminence in cultural activities, an attempt was made at learning why some works creators produce are more famous than others. This paper specifically investigates the differential fame of 5,046 themes by 10 eminent composers of classical music. Hypotheses derived from past research in creativity and esthetics were tested using a computerized content analysis. The results show that (a) the fame of a musical theme is a positive linear function of melodic originality (rather then a curvilinear inverted-U function), and (b) melodic originality is a positive function of biographical stress and of historical time, and an inverted backwards-J function of age.

[1]  R. Francés,et al.  Comparative effects of six collative variables on interest and preference in adults of different educational levels. , 1976 .

[2]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Eminence, creativity, and geographical marginality: A recursive structural equation model. , 1977 .

[3]  D. Simonton.  Age and Literary Creativity , 1975 .

[4]  R. S. Albert,et al.  Toward a behavioral definition of genius. , 1975, The American psychologist.

[5]  Ronald G. Heyduk.  Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency , 1975 .

[6]  D. Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity, age, and stress: a biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  W. Paisley,et al.  IDENTIFYING THE UNKNOWN COMMUNICATOR IN PAINTING, LITERATURE AND MUSIC: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MINOR ENCODING HABITS. , 1964, The Journal of communication.

[8]  T. H. Holmes,et al.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. , 1967, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[9]  P. Vitz,et al.  PREFERENCES FOR RATES OF INFORMATION PRESENTED BY SEQUENCES OF TONES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Loren Steck,et al.  Preference for Musical Complexity: Effects of Context. , 1975 .

[11]  P J Chamberlain,et al.  Pitch and Duration in Recognition of Music-Like Structures , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  C. Martindale.  An experimental simulation of literary change. , 1973 .

[13]  D. Berlyne.  Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[14]  Verbal complexity and preferences in poetry , 1966 .