Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors

Two of the most important models to account for the specificity and sensitivity of the T cell receptor (TCR) are the kinetic proofreading and serial ligation models. However, although kinetic proofreading provides a means for individual TCRs to measure accurately the length of time they are engaged and signal appropriately, the stochastic nature of ligand dissociation means the kinetic proofreading model implies that at high concentrations the response of the cell will be relatively nonspecific. Recent ligand experiments have revealed the phenomenon of both negative and positive crosstalk among neighboring TCRs. By using a Monte Carlo simulation of a lattice of TCRs, we integrate receptor crosstalk with the kinetic proofreading and serial ligation models and discover that receptor cooperativity can enhance T cell specificity significantly at a very modest cost to the sensitivity of the response.

[1]  Emil R. Unanue,et al.  Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation , 1990, Nature.

[2]  P. Marrack,et al.  The Repertoire of T Cells Shaped by a Single MHC/Peptide Ligand , 1996, Cell.

[3]  C. Janeway,et al.  Ligands for the T-cell receptor: hard times for avidity models. , 1995, Immunology today.

[4]  R. Germain,et al.  Variant TCR ligands: new insights into the molecular basis of antigen-dependent signal transduction and T-cell activation. , 1996, Seminars in immunology.

[5]  H. Ploegh,et al.  Peptide antagonism and T cell receptor interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. , 1998, Immunity.

[6]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T Cell Activation Determined by T Cell Receptor Number and Tunable Thresholds , 1996, Science.

[7]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[8]  S. Valitutti,et al.  The efficiency of antigen recognition by CD8+ CTL clones is determined by the frequency of serial TCR engagement. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[9]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  T. Mak,et al.  Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. , 1997, Immunity.

[11]  R. Germain,et al.  Serial TCR engagement and down-modulation by peptide:MHC molecule ligands: relationship to the quality of individual TCR signaling events. , 1999, Journal of immunology.

[12]  Graham M Lord,et al.  A kinetic differentiation model for the action of altered TCR ligands. , 1999, Immunology today.

[13]  U. Staerz,et al.  A Physiological Ligand of Positive Selection Is Seen with High Specificity1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[14]  P. Romero,et al.  CD8 modulation of T-cell antigen receptor–ligand interactions on living cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1995, Nature.

[15]  M. Bevan,et al.  T cell receptor antagonists and partial agonists. , 1995, Immunity.

[16]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  CD8 enhances formation of stable T-cell receptor/MHC class I molecule complexes , 1996, Nature.

[17]  B. Chain,et al.  Self/nonself discrimination among immunoregulatory (CD4) T cells. , 2000, Seminars in immunology.

[18]  P. Allen,et al.  Significance of T-cell stimulation by altered peptide ligands in T cell biology. , 1995, Current opinion in immunology.

[19]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of TCRs: a basis for the sensitivity and specificity of antigen recognition. , 1997, Immunology today.

[20]  R. Germain,et al.  Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire. , 1999, Immunity.

[21]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. , 1999, Immunity.

[22]  T. Duke,et al.  Heightened sensitivity of a lattice of membrane receptors. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Tuning of activation thresholds explains flexibility in the selection and development of T cells in the thymus. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  U. Staerz,et al.  Positive selection of an H2-M3 restricted T cell receptor. , 1999, Immunity.

[26]  S. Jameson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. , 1999, Immunity.

[27]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Colin R. F. Monks,et al.  Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells , 1998, Nature.

[29]  Z. Grossman,et al.  Adaptive cellular interactions in the immune system: the tunable activation threshold and the significance of subthreshold responses. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  S. Bromley,et al.  The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. , 1999, Science.

[31]  K. Siminovitch,et al.  Signaling capacity of the T cell antigen receptor is negatively regulated by the PTP1C tyrosine phosphatase , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[32]  R. Germain,et al.  The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. , 1999, Annual review of immunology.

[33]  Y. Chien,et al.  A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. , 1996, Immunity.

[34]  C. Janeway,et al.  Cross-antagonism of a T cell clone expressing two distinct T cell receptors. , 1999, Immunity.

[35]  H. Grey,et al.  The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. , 1990, Science.

[36]  H. Ruley,et al.  H2-M Mutant Mice Are Defective in the Peptide Loading of Class II Molecules, Antigen Presentation, and T Cell Repertoire Selection , 1996, Cell.

[37]  B. Evavold,et al.  Cutting edge: dueling TCRs: peptide antagonism of CD4+ T cells with dual antigen specificities. , 1998, Journal of immunology.