Intra-Organizational Computation and Complexity

Abstract : Organizations are complex systems. They are also information processing systems comprised of a large number of agents such as human beings. Combining these perspectives and recognizing the essential non-linear dynamics that are at work leads to the standard non-linear multi-agent system conclusions such as: history matters, organizational behavior and form is path dependent, complex behavior emerges from individual interaction, and change is inevitable. Such a view while descriptive, is still far from the level of specificity and predictive richness that is necessary for organizational theory. To increase the specificity and value of our theories we will need to take into account more of the actual attributes of tasks, resources, knowledge and human cognition. In doing so, it will be possible to achieve a more adequate description of organizations as complex computational systems. More importantly, we will also achieve a greater ability to theorize about the complexity of organizational behavior. This paper describes complexity theory and computational organization theory. Then a description of organizations as complex computational systems is presented and operationalized as a computational model. Within this perspective, organizational behavior results form the actions of heterogeneous actors, the boundaries between agents, tasks, and resources are permeable, organizational roles emerge, organizational groups are networks, and information technology plays a key role as an interactive agents.

[1]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Validating Computational Models , 1996 .

[3]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The star system: a unified multiagent simulation model of structure, task, agent, and resource , 1999 .

[4]  R. Hall,et al.  Organizational Size, Complexity, and Formalization , 1967 .

[5]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Complex organizations : a sociological reader , 1961 .

[6]  Alan H. Bond,et al.  Distributed Artificial Intelligence , 1988 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[8]  K. Carley,et al.  Evolution of Networks ON THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS , 2001 .

[9]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[10]  E. Bonabeau.  How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality (copernicus) , 1997 .

[11]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier , 2000 .

[12]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[14]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[15]  Theresa K. Lant,et al.  Computer simulations of organizations as experiential learning systems: implications for organization theory , 1994 .

[16]  Abraham Lempel,et al.  On the Complexity of Finite Sequences , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Computational Organization Theory , 2000 .

[18]  Osman Balci.  Validation, verification, and testing techniques throughout the life cycle of a simulation study , 1994, WSC '94.

[19]  G. Carroll,et al.  Keeping the faith: A model of cultural transmission in formal organizations , 1991 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A PCANS Model of Structure in Organizations , 1998 .

[21]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Communication Technologies and their Effect on Cultural Homogeneity, Consensus, and the Diffusion of New Ideas , 1995 .

[22]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[23]  S. Klatzky.  Relationship of Organizational Size to Complexity and Coordination. , 1970 .

[24]  Mats G. Nordahl,et al.  Complexity Measures and Cellular Automata , 1988, Complex Syst..

[25]  G. Cowan,et al.  Complexity Metaphors, Models, and Reality , 1994 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Carley.  On generating hypotheses using computer simulations , 1999 .

[27]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1997, Complex.

[28]  M. Sastry.  Problems and Paradoxes in a Model of Punctuated Organizational Change , 1997 .

[29]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND THE RISE OF AN INFORMATION ELITE CAN COMMUNICATION HELP THE INFORMATION RICH GET RICHER , 2002 .

[30]  Peter E. Earl,et al.  Contingency, Complexity and the Theory of the Firm , 1999 .

[31]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[32]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Complexity Theory in Organization Science: Seizing the Promise or Becoming a Fad? , 1999 .

[33]  S. Kauffman.  At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[34]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism , 1994 .

[35]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[36]  Kathleen M. Carley.  STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND LEARNING WITHIN ORGANIZATIONS , 2001 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change. , 1994 .

[38]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[39]  Robert L. Axtell,et al.  Aligning simulation models: A case study and results , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[40]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process , 1996 .

[41]  Michael C. White,et al.  Why Study the Complexity Sciences in the Social Sciences? , 1999 .

[42]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic organizational diagnosis and design : developing theory for application , 1995 .

[43]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  ACTS theory: extending the model of bounded rationality , 1994 .

[44]  Raymond A. Eve,et al.  Chaos, complexity, and sociology : myths, models, and theories , 1998 .

[45]  YAN JIN,et al.  The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[46]  Michael C. White,et al.  The Evolution of Organizations: Suggestions from Complexity Theory About the Interplay Between Natural Selection and Adaptation , 1997 .

[47]  J. Christensen,et al.  John W.Meyer & W.Richard Scott (eds.), Organizational Environments. Ritual and Rationality, Updated ed., Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992, 302 s. , 1992 .

[48]  Norman P. Hummon.  Organizational structures and network processes , 1990 .

[49]  組織学会.  組織科学 = Organizational science , 1967 .

[50]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .

[51]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[52]  William A. Barnett,et al.  Commerce, Complexity, and Evolution: Topics in Economics, Finance, Marketing and Management , 2000 .

[53]  M. Macy.  Chains of Cooperation: Threshold Effects in Collective Action , 1991 .

[54]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The nature of the social agent , 1994 .

[55]  R. Thietart,et al.  Chaos Theory and Organization , 1995 .