GLACE: The Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part II: Analysis

The 12 weather and climate models participating in the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) show both a wide variation in the strength of land–atmosphere coupling and some intriguing commonalities. In this paper, the causes of variations in coupling strength—both the geographic variations within a given model and the model-to-model differences—are addressed. The ability of soil moisture to affect precipitation is examined in two stages, namely, the ability of the soil moisture to affect evaporation, and the ability of evaporation to affect precipitation. Most of the differences between the models and within a given model are found to be associated with the first stage—an evaporation rate that varies strongly and consistently with soil moisture tends to lead to a higher coupling strength. The first-stage differences reflect identifiable differences in model parameterization and model climate. Intermodel differences in the evaporation–precipitation connection, however, also play a key role.

[1]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Soil Moisture Memory in Climate Models , 2001 .

[2]  T. Phillips,et al.  A proposal for a general interface between land surface schemes and general circulation models , 1998 .

[3]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  An annual cycle of vegetation in a GCM. Part I: implementation and impact on evaporation , 2004 .

[4]  R. Koster,et al.  Comparing the Degree of Land-Atmosphere Interaction in Four Atmospheric General Circulation Models , 2013 .

[5]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Sensitivity of Surface Fluxes to Soil Water Content in Three Land Surface Schemes , 2000 .

[6]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  The land surface‐atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectives , 1996 .

[7]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  An annual cycle of vegetation in a GCM. Part II: global impacts on climate and hydrology , 2004 .

[8]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  A Soil Moisture–Rainfall Feedback Mechanism: 1. Theory and observations , 1998 .

[9]  D. Lawrence,et al.  GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview , 2006 .

[10]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Variability in Large-Scale Water Balance with Land Surface-Atmosphere Interaction , 1992 .

[11]  Jan Polcher,et al.  A Proposed Structure for Coupling Tiled Surfaces with the Planetary Boundary Layer , 2004 .

[12]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation , 2004, Science.

[13]  P. Dirmeyer An Evaluation of the Strength of Land–Atmosphere Coupling , 2001 .

[14]  P. Milly,et al.  A Model-Based Investigation of Soil Moisture Predictability and Associated Climate Predictability , 2002 .

[15]  Kenneth E. Mitchell,et al.  Eta model estimated land surface processes and the hydrologic cycle of the Mississippi basin , 2003 .

[16]  Elfatih A. B. Eltahir,et al.  Atmospheric Controls on Soil Moisture-Boundary Layer Interactions. Part II: Feedbacks within the Continental United States , 2003 .

[17]  H. Douville Assessing the Influence of Soil Moisture on Seasonal Climate Variability with AGCMs , 2003 .