Complications of circulatory assist

Patients in whom mechanical circulatory support is indicated constitute a very special cohort who are in a multimorbid condition. Most of them either have a long history of heart failure or are in severe cardiogenic shock refractory to medical therapy and intra-aortic balloon pumping. They frequently develop secondary organ dysfunction and are in imminent risk of death prior to the implantation of the assist device, which is the only therapeutic alternative. In addition, these patients undergo a highly sophisticated operation, putting further strain on them by an extended duration of surgery and major blood loss. All these factors might influence the incidence of complications associated with heart assist devices. Since their introduction more than 20 years ago, some systems have been developed to a stage that allows the routine clinical use in many cardiosurgical centers worldwide. Several ventricular assist devices (VADs), such as Thoratec VAD (Thoratec Laboratories, Berkeley, CA, USA) Novacor left ventricular device (LVAD; Novacor-Baxter, Oakland, CA, USA) and HeartMate LVAD (Thermo Cardiosystems, Woburne, MA, USA) have even celebrated their thousandth implantation recently. In 1999, a new era of ventricular assist devices was inaugurated with the first implantations of the miniaturized DeBakey VADTM (Micromed Inc., Woodlands, TX, USA) and the fully implantable systems LionHeartTM LVD 2000 LVAD. Against the background of our 12-year experience with 450 patients, we focus our attention on the complications associated with this treatment modality and their management. Methods

[1]  G. Jett ABIOMED BVS 5000: experience and potential advantages. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  H. Scheld,et al.  Left ventricular assist device infection is associated with increased mortality but is not a contraindication to transplantation. , 1997, Circulation.

[3]  M. Oz,et al.  The influence of infection on survival and successful transplantation in patients with left ventricular assist devices. , 1997, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  H. Scheld,et al.  Rupture of inflow conduits in the TCI-HeartMate system. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  V. Poirier The heartmate left ventricular assist system: worldwide clinical results. , 1997, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  E. Ringelstein,et al.  Cerebral and systemic embolization during left ventricular support with the Novacor N100 device. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  G. Jett,et al.  Late tamponade with mechanical circulatory support. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  P. McCarthy,et al.  One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  R. Körfer,et al.  A fatal mechanical disorder of the TCI HeartMate left ventricular assist system. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  K. Naunheim,et al.  Clinical experience with 111 thoratec ventricular assist devices. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  G. Tenderich,et al.  Novacor left ventricular assist system versus Heartmate vented electric left ventricular assist system as a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in bridging patients: a prospective study. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.