Extracting spatio‐temporal patterns in animal trajectories: an ecological application of sequence analysis methods

Summary Digital tracking technologies have considerably increased the amount and quality of animal trajectories, enabling the study of habitat use and habitat selection at a fine spatial and temporal scale. However, current approaches do not yet explicitly account for a key aspect of habitat use, namely the sequential variation in the use of different habitat features. To overcome this limitation, we propose a tree-based approach that makes use of sequence analysis methods, derived from molecular biology, to explore and identify ecologically relevant sequential patterns in habitat use by animals. We applied this approach to ecological data consisting of simulated and real trajectories from a roe deer population (Capreolus capreolus), expressed as ordered sequences of habitat use. We show that our approach effectively captured spatio-temporal patterns of sequential habitat use by roe deer. In our case study, individual sequences were clustered according to the sequential use of the elevation gradient (first order) and of open/closed habitats (second order). We provided evidence for several behavioural processes, such as migration and daily alternating habitat use. Some unexpected patterns, such as homogeneous sequences of use of open habitat, could also be identified. Our findings advocate the importance of dealing with the sequential nature of movement data. Approaches based on sequence analysis methods are particularly useful and effective since they allow exploring temporal patterns of habitat use in a synthetic and visually captive manner. The proposed approach represents a useful and effective way to classify individual movement behaviour across populations and species. Ultimately, this method can be applied to explore the temporal scale of ecological processes based on movement.

[1]  R. Quentin Grafton,et al.  Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) , 2012 .

[2]  Leo Polansky,et al.  Disentangling the effects of forage, social rank, and risk on movement autocorrelation of elephants using Fourier and wavelet analyses , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[4]  B. Worton Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators , 1995 .

[5]  Bettina Speckmann,et al.  Context-Aware Similarity of Trajectories , 2012, GIScience.

[6]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[7]  S. Saïd,et al.  The Influence of Landscape Structure on Female Roe Deer Home-range Size , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  M. Ramanzin,et al.  Seasonal migration and home range of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Italian eastern Alps , 2007 .

[9]  B. Ripley,et al.  Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees , 2015 .

[10]  Christian Hennig,et al.  Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[11]  Michael S. Rosenberg,et al.  Sequence alignment : methods, models, concepts, and strategies , 2009 .

[12]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioural gradient determined by ecological factors , 2011 .

[13]  Lawrence L. Wu Some Comments on “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect” , 2000 .

[14]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[15]  Gilbert Ritschard,et al.  Analyzing and Visualizing State Sequences in R with TraMineR , 2011 .

[16]  Manuela Royer-Carenzi,et al.  The exploratory analysis of autocorrelation in animal-movement studies , 2010, Ecological Research.

[17]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Beyond the Utilization Distribution: Identifying home range areas that are intensively exploited or repeatedly visited , 2012 .

[18]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[19]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Cote,et al.  Interindividual variability in habitat use: evidence for a risk management syndrome in roe deer? , 2015 .

[21]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Wildlife tracking data management: a new vision , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Jan-Åke Nilsson,et al.  To boldly go: individual differences in boldness influence migratory tendency. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[23]  Clarke Wilson,et al.  Activity patterns in space and time: calculating representative Hagerstrand trajectories , 2008 .

[24]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[25]  C. Calenge,et al.  A general framework for the statistical exploration of the ecological niche. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[28]  A. Abbott Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas , 1995 .

[29]  Noam Shoval,et al.  Sequence Alignment as a Method for Human Activity Analysis in Space and Time , 2007 .

[30]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Analysing spatiotemporal sequences in Bluetooth tracking data , 2012 .

[31]  Shmuel Tomi Klein,et al.  Fuzzy Hamming Distance: A New Dissimilarity Measure , 2001, CPM.

[32]  Marco Heurich,et al.  An event-based conceptual model for context-aware movement analysis , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..