The Atlanta Classification, Revised Atlanta Classification, and Determinant-Based Classification of Acute Pancreatitis: Which Is Best at Stratifying Outcomes?

Objectives To determine which classification is more accurate in stratifying severity. Methods The study used a retrospective analysis of a prospective acute pancreatitis database (June 2005–December 2007). Acute pancreatitis severity was stratified according to the Atlanta classification (AC) 1992, the revised Atlanta classification (RAC) 2012, and the determinant-based classification (DBC) 2012. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve) compared the accuracy of each classification. Logistic regression identified predictors of mortality. Results 338 patients were analyzed: 13% had persistent organ failure (POF) (>48 hours), of whom 37% had multisystem POF, and 11% had pancreatic necrosis, of whom 19% had infected necrosis. Mortality was 4.1%. For predicting mortality (area under the curve), the RAC (0.91) and DBC (0.92) were comparable (P = 0.404); both outperformed the AC (0.81) (P < 0.001). For intensive care unit admission, the RAC (0.85) and DBC (0.85) were comparable (P = 0.949); both outperformed the AC (0.79) (P < 0.05). There were 2 patients in the critical category of the DBC. Multisystem POF was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 75.0; 95% confidence interval, 13.7–410.6; P < 0.001), whereas single-system POF, sterile necrosis, and infected necrosis were not. Conclusion The RAC and DBC were generally comparable in stratifying severity. The paucity of patients in the critical category in the DBC limits its utility. Neither classification accounts for the impact of multisystem POF, which was the strongest predictor of mortality.

[1]  Myung-Hwan Kim,et al.  Clinical relevance of the revised Atlanta classification focusing on severity stratification system. , 2014, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.].

[2]  Vikesh K. Singh,et al.  A Population-Based Evaluation of Severity and Mortality Among Transferred Patients With Acute Pancreatitis , 2014, Pancreas.

[3]  R. Talukdar,et al.  Clinical utility of the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis in a prospective cohort: have all loose ends been tied? , 2014, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.].

[4]  Zongwen Huang,et al.  The Role of Organ Failure and Infection in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Prospective Study , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[5]  M. Boermeester,et al.  The role of routine fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of infected necrotizing pancreatitis. , 2014, Surgery.

[6]  J. Sánchez-Payá,et al.  Validation of the determinant-based classification and revision of the Atlanta classification systems for acute pancreatitis. , 2014, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[7]  H. Nawaz,et al.  Revised Atlanta and Determinant-Based Classification: Application in a Prospective Cohort of Acute Pancreatitis Patients , 2013, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[8]  Kartar Singh,et al.  Prospective Validation of 4-Category Classification of Acute Pancreatitis Severity , 2013, Pancreas.

[9]  John A. Windsor,et al.  Determinant-Based Classification of Acute Pancreatitis Severity: An International Multidisciplinary Consultation , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[10]  K. Horvath,et al.  Interventions for Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Summary of a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference , 2012, Pancreas.

[11]  Colin D Johnson,et al.  Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus , 2012, Gut.

[12]  Bin Xu,et al.  The Day When Infection Is Confirmed Is a Better Time Point for Mortality Prediction in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis , 2012, Pancreas.

[13]  R. Talukdar,et al.  Moderately Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Prospective Validation of This New Subgroup of Acute Pancreatitis , 2012, Pancreas.

[14]  M. Boermeester,et al.  A conservative and minimally invasive approach to necrotizing pancreatitis improves outcome. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[15]  J. Windsor,et al.  Infected pancreatic necrosis: not necessarily a late event in acute pancreatitis. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[16]  Bechien U. Wu,et al.  Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital--analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. , 2011, Radiology.

[17]  J. Windsor,et al.  Organ failure and infection of pancreatic necrosis as determinants of mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[18]  B. Petersen,et al.  Low Mortality and High Morbidity in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Without Organ Failure: A Case for Revising the Atlanta Classification to Include “Moderately Severe Acute Pancreatitis” , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[19]  H. G. Gooszen,et al.  Timing of surgical intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[20]  H. Reber,et al.  Clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. , 1993, Pancreas.

[21]  E L Bradley,et al.  A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. , 1993, Archives of surgery.

[22]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.