In vivo evaluation of novel hyaluronan/chitosan microparticulate delivery systems for the nasal delivery of gentamicin in rabbits.

Biodegradable microparticles containing gentamicin were prepared using chitosan hydroglutamate (CH), hyaluronic acid (HA) and a combination of both polymers by a solvent evaporation method. These formulations were administered nasally via an insufflator. Gentamicin was also administered nasally into rabbits as a solution and powder (a physical mixture of gentamicin and lactose), intravenously (IV) and intramuscularly (IM). The resultant serum levels of gentamicin were determined by Fluorescence Polarisation Immunoassay (FPIA). The bioavailability of gentamicin was poor when administered as a nasal solution (1.1%) and dry powder (2.1%) when compared with IV. However, the microparticulate systems composed of CH and HA/CH considerably enhanced the bioavailability of gentamicin (31.4 and 42.9%, respectively,) with HA microparticles inducing a less significant enhancement (23.3%). Previous in vitro dissolution and frog palate studies indicated that these microparticulate formulations were all mucoadhesive and demonstrated prolonged drug release. Such findings were translated into an increase in the bioavailability of gentamicin when compared with a simple nasal solution in vivo. When HA and CH were combined in the HA/CH formulation, the polymers appeared to improve the absorption of incorporated gentamicin synergistically in comparison to the individual polymers, suggesting a promising nasal delivery system.

[1]  S. Lethagen,et al.  Effect of viscosity on particle size, deposition, and clearance of nasal delivery systems containing desmopressin. , 1988, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[2]  G. P. Martin,et al.  Evaluation of the bioadhesive properties of hyaluronan derivatives: Detachment weight and mucociliary transport rate studies , 1996 .

[3]  F. Merkus,et al.  Nasal Insulin Delivery with Dimethyl-β-Cyclodextrin as an Absorption Enhancer in Rabbits: Powder More Effective than Liquid Formulations , 1993, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  Gerrit Borchard,et al.  The potential of mucoadhesive polymers in enhancing intestinal peptide drug absorption. III: Effects of chitosan-glutamate and carbomer on epithelial tight junctions in vitro , 1996 .

[5]  A. Rubinstein Intranasal administration of gentamicin in human subjects , 1983, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[6]  K Morimoto,et al.  Enhancement of nasal absorption of insulin and calcitonin using polyacrylic acid gel , 1985, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[7]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Effects of Proteolytic Enzyme Inhibitors on the Nasal Absorption of Vasopressin and an Analogue , 1991, Pharmaceutical Research.

[8]  A. Mitra,et al.  Bile Salt–Fatty Acid Mixed Micelles as Nasal Absorption Promoters of Peptides. II. In Vivo Nasal Absorption of Insulin in Rats and Effects of Mixed Micelles on the Morphological Integrity of the Nasal Mucosa , 1990, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  D A Smith,et al.  The effect of molecular size on the nasal absorption of water‐soluble compounds in the albino rat , 1987, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[10]  M. Mishima,et al.  Studies on the promoting effects of medium chain fatty acid salts on the nasal absorption of insulin in rats. , 1987, Journal of pharmacobio-dynamics.

[11]  Y. Takatsuka,et al.  Effect of surfactants on the nasal absorption of insulin in rats , 1981 .

[12]  Lisbeth Illum,et al.  Nasal administration of insulin using bioadhesive microspheres as a delivery system , 1990 .

[13]  D J Berry,et al.  Preparation and evaluation of the in vitro drug release properties and mucoadhesion of novel microspheres of hyaluronic acid and chitosan. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[14]  H Lennernäs,et al.  Chitosans as absorption enhancers of poorly absorbable drugs. 3: Influence of mucus on absorption enhancement. , 1999, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[15]  S. Davis,et al.  Nasal administration of gentamicin using a novel microsphere delivery system , 1988 .

[16]  H. Junginger,et al.  MUCOADHESIVE POLYMERS IN PERORAL PEPTIDE DRUG DELIVERY. I. INFLUENCE OF MUCOADHESIVE EXCIPIENTS ON THE PROTEOLYTIC ACTIVITY OF INTESTINAL ENZYMES , 1996 .

[17]  Y. J. Wang,et al.  Intranasal bioavailability of insulin powder formulations: effect of permeation enhancer-to-protein ratio. , 1991, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[18]  P. Edman,et al.  Effect of polymers and microspheres on the nasal absorption of insulin in rats , 1992 .

[19]  Lisbeth Illum,et al.  Hyaluronic acid ester microspheres as a nasal delivery system for insulin , 1994 .

[20]  G. Duchateau,et al.  Bile salts and intranasal drug absorption , 1986 .

[21]  L. Illum BIOADHESIVE FORMULATIONS FOR NASAL PEPTIDE DELIVERY , 1999 .

[22]  M. Alonso,et al.  Chitosan and Chitosan/Ethylene Oxide-Propylene Oxide Block Copolymer Nanoparticles as Novel Carriers for Proteins and Vaccines , 1997, Pharmaceutical Research.

[23]  P. Edman,et al.  Characterization of degradable starch microspheres as a nasal delivery system for drugs , 1990 .

[24]  Lisbeth Illum,et al.  Effect of Chitosan on the Permeability of Monolayers of Intestinal Epithelial Cells (Caco-2) , 1994, Pharmaceutical Research.