Accuracy in dental medicine, a new way to measure trueness and precision.

Reference scanners are used in dental medicine to verify a lot of procedures. The main interest is to verify impression methods as they serve as a base for dental restorations. The current limitation of many reference scanners is the lack of accuracy scanning large objects like full dental arches, or the limited possibility to assess detailed tooth surfaces. A new reference scanner, based on focus variation scanning technique, was evaluated with regards to highest local and general accuracy. A specific scanning protocol was tested to scan original tooth surface from dental impressions. Also, different model materials were verified. The results showed a high scanning accuracy of the reference scanner with a mean deviation of 5.3 ± 1.1 µm for trueness and 1.6 ± 0.6 µm for precision in case of full arch scans. Current dental impression methods showed much higher deviations (trueness: 20.4 ± 2.2 µm, precision: 12.5 ± 2.5 µm) than the internal scanning accuracy of the reference scanner. Smaller objects like single tooth surface can be scanned with an even higher accuracy, enabling the system to assess erosive and abrasive tooth surface loss. The reference scanner can be used to measure differences for a lot of dental research fields. The different magnification levels combined with a high local and general accuracy can be used to assess changes of single teeth or restorations up to full arch changes.

[1]  A. Mehl,et al.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[2]  Andreas Ender,et al.  A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  Alex Hoyos,et al.  Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. , 2011, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[4]  A Ender,et al.  Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. , 2013, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[5]  M. Compagnoni,et al.  Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  Simon T Vlaar,et al.  Accuracy of dental digitizers. , 2006, International dental journal.

[7]  A Ender,et al.  Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. , 2009, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[8]  Albert Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. , 2013, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Yijin Ren,et al.  Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Matts Andersson,et al.  Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  Andreas Ender,et al.  Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  Michael H. Walter,et al.  A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  Andreas Ender,et al.  Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  Giuseppe Varvara,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  M. Roos,et al.  Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. , 2008, European journal of oral sciences.