Defining and interpreting pregnancy success rates for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVES To review current practice in describing pregnancy success rates after IVF-ET, to identify issues associated with interpreting these rates, and to suggest useful methods of describing these rates in the future. DESIGN Review of literature concerning medical, epidemiologic, and statistical aspects of reporting IVF-ET pregnancy success rates. SETTING The United States. PATIENTS Infertile couples participating in IVF-ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Usefulness and accuracy of IVF-ET pregnancy reporting. RESULTS Several groups have collected information on the pregnancy success rates of IVF-ET clinics and have discussed appropriate definitions of pregnancy success. The largest of these groups in the United States is The American Fertility Society and its affiliate, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The number of live deliveries per 100 ET procedures and the number of live deliveries per 100 egg retrieval procedures are among the most commonly used definitions. CONCLUSION The most commonly used definitions are particularly useful for describing the probability that a live infant will be delivered after IVF-ET is completed. To measure the effectiveness of the IVF-ET procedures and the costs of undergoing IVF-ET, other definitions are also important. Success rates need to be stratified by patient characteristics, such as age, that affect the probability of success.

[1]  A. Trounson,et al.  The relationship of tubal blockage, infertility of unknown cause, suspected male infertility, and endometriosis to success of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. , 1983, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  A. Murdoch,et al.  Is GIFT (gamete intrafallopian transfer) the best treatment for unexplained infertility? , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  R. Edwards,et al.  Observations on 767 clinical pregnancies and 500 births after human in-vitro fertilization. , 1986, Human reproduction.

[4]  G. Faure,et al.  Antiovary antibodies, repeated attempts, and outcome of in vitro fertilization. , 1991 .

[5]  E. Lamb,et al.  The mean interval to conception: a measure of utility for the analysis of decisions involving fertility. , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  A. Decherney,et al.  Heterogeneity in patient populations explains differences in in vitro fertilization programs. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  Clarice R. Weinberg,et al.  Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  P. Lancaster Assisted Conception: Health Services and Evaluation , 1991, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  E. Belsey,et al.  The description of menstrual bleeding patterns: towards fewer measures. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  R. Frydman,et al.  World collaborative report on IVF-ET and GIFT: 1989 results. , 1992, Human reproduction.

[11]  R. Jansen Spontaneous abortion incidence in the treatment of infertility. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  A parametric method for comparing cumulative pregnancy curves following infertility therapy. , 1982, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  M. Seibel A new era in reproductive technology. In vitro fertilization, gamete intrafallopian transfer, and donated gametes and embryos. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  H. Jones,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rates for in vitro fertilization. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  M. Seibel,et al.  In vitro fertilization: how much is enough? , 1989, New England Journal of Medicine.

[16]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Results of in vitro fertilization attempts in women 40 years of age and older: the Norfolk experience. , 1987, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  Matson Pl,et al.  The influence of infertility etiology on the outcome of IVF-ET and GIFT treatments. , 1990 .

[18]  J. Rock,et al.  Estimation of a model of cumulative pregnancy following infertility therapy. , 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  D. Cramer,et al.  Statistical methods in evaluating the outcome of infertility therapy. , 1979, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  R. Edwards,et al.  High fecundity of amenorrhoeic women in embryo-transfer programmes , 1991, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Guzick,et al.  Convenient numerical procedures for estimating cumulative pregnancy curves. , 1992, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  R. Asch Uterine versus Tubal Embryo Transfer in the Human , 1991, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Meldrum In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1989 results from the IVF-ET Registry. Medical Research International, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, The American Fertility Society. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  D. Olive,et al.  Treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility with CO2 laser laparoscopy: the use of one- and two-parameter exponential models. , 1987, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  J. Rock,et al.  Laparoscopic cautery in the treatment of endometriosis-related infertility. , 1991, Fertility and sterility.