IMPROVING THE FORMABILITY OF STAINLESS STEEL 321 THROUGH MULTISTEP DEFORMATION FOR HYDROFORMING APPLICATIONS

Tube hydroforming (THF) is a well established process in the automotive industry and its application is being extended to the aerospace for manufacturing complex geometries. However, most of the alloys used in aerospace are high in strength and low in formability, which renders the application of THF more challenging. The objective of this paper is to present a method to increase the formability of an austenitic stainless steel. A multistep forming process was simulated through interrupted uniaxial tensile testing experiments to study the influence of the latter process on formability. The tensile test was divided into several deformation steps with a stress relief heat treatment after each forming step. The results indicated that the application of intermediate heat treatments considerably increased the formability of the stainless steel 321 alloy (SS321). Microstructure evolution as a function of deformation or heat treatment parameters was also investigated and revealed the formation of strain-induced martensite after the first deformation and heat treatment cycle without any deleterious effect on formability enhancement.

[1]  Shi-Hong Zhang,et al.  Developments in hydroforming , 1999 .

[2]  Shi-Hong Zhang,et al.  Hydroforming Highlights: Sheet Hydroforming and Tube Hydroforming , 2004 .

[3]  G. Olson,et al.  A general mechanism of martensitic nucleation: Part I. General concepts and the FCC→HCP transformation , 1976 .

[4]  S. Golovashchenko,et al.  Improvement of formability of 6xxx aluminum alloys using incremental forming technology , 2005 .

[5]  D. Bhattacharya,et al.  Influence of strain-induced phase transformation on the surface crystallographic texture in cold-rolled-and-aged austenitic stainless steel , 2005 .

[6]  D. K. Allen.  Metallurgy Theory and Practice , 1969 .

[7]  I. Solomon,et al.  Deformation induced martensite in AISI 316 stainless steel , 2010 .

[8]  J. Humphreys.  Nucleation in Recrystallization , 2004 .

[9]  Joseph Datsko,et al.  Material Properties and Manufacturing Processes , 1966 .

[10]  T. Kjer,et al.  Tensile properties of metastable stainless steels , 1972 .

[11]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Formability of stainless steel , 1998 .

[12]  A. Pineau,et al.  Martensitic transformations induced by plastic deformation in the Fe-Ni-Cr-C system , 1972 .

[13]  Hannu Hänninen,et al.  Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced γ → α′-martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels , 2005 .

[14]  Siegfried S. Hecker,et al.  Effects of Strain State and Strain Rate on Deformation-Induced Transformation in 304 Stainless Steel: Part I. Magnetic Measurements and Mechanical Behavior , 1982 .

[15]  Taylan Altan,et al.  An overall review of the tube hydroforming (THF) technology , 2001 .

[16]  M. Niffenegger,et al.  Influencing parameters on martensite transformation during low cycle fatigue for steel AISI 321 , 2006 .

[17]  G. Thomas,et al.  Structure and properties of thermal-mechanically treated 304 stainless steel , 1970 .

[18]  F. Walther,et al.  Deformation-induced martensitic transformation in metastable austenitic steels , 2008 .

[19]  S. Ghosh,et al.  Effect of reversion of strain induced martensite on microstructure and mechanical properties in an austenitic stainless steel , 2011 .

[20]  H. W. Swift.  Plastic instability under plane stress , 1952 .

[21]  D. Matlock,et al.  The formability of austenitic stainless steels , 1997 .

[22]  T. Angel,et al.  Formation of Martensite in Austenitic Stainless Steels , 1954 .