Automatic computer aided detection of abnormalities in multi-parametric prostate MRI

Development of CAD systems for detection of prostate cancer has been a recent topic of research. A multi-stage computer aided detection scheme is proposed to help reduce perception and oversight errors in multi-parametric prostate cancer screening MRI. In addition, important features for development of computer aided detection systems for prostate cancer screening MRI are identified. A fast, robust prostate segmentation routine is used to segment the prostate, based on coupled appearance and anatomy models. Subsequently a voxel classification is performed using a support vector machine to compute an abnormality likelihood map of the prostate. This classification step is based on quantitative voxel features like the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and pharmacokinetic parameters. Local maxima in the likelihood map are found using a local maxima detector, after which regions around the local maxima are segmented. Region features are computed to represent statistical properties of the voxel features within the regions. Region classification is performed using these features, which results in a likelihood of abnormality per region. Performance was validated using a 188 patient dataset in a leave-one-patient-out manner. Ground truth was annotated by two expert radiologists. The results were evaluated using FROC analysis. The FROC curves show that inclusion of ADC and pharmacokinetic parameter features increases the performance of an automatic detection system. In addition it shows the potential of such an automated system in aiding radiologists diagnosing prostate MR, obtaining a sensitivity of respectively 74.7% and 83.4% at 7 and 9 false positives per patient.

[1]  J. Babb,et al.  Prostate cancer vs. post‐biopsy hemorrhage: Diagnosis with T2‐ and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[3]  A. D'Amico,et al.  American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  Pieter C. Vos,et al.  Automated Calibration for Computerized Analysis of Prostate Lesions Using Pharmacokinetic Magnetic Resonance Images , 2009, MICCAI.

[5]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[7]  J. Mugler,et al.  Changes in regional airflow obstruction over time in the lungs of patients with asthma: evaluation with 3He MR imaging. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  A. Evans,et al.  Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features. , 2010, Radiology.

[9]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Adam S. Kibel,et al.  Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study , 2009 .

[11]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.