IEEE 802.11n/ac Data Rates under Power Constraints

IEEE 802.11n/ac are two recent enhancements that increase the data rates of WLANs significantly thanks to the use of channel bonding, spatial multiplexing, an additional short guard interval, and new modulation and coding schemes. They offer a maximum transmission rate of 600 Mbps for 802.11n and 7 Gbps for 802.11ac. Due to regulatory power constraints, the sender may be obliged to divide its transmission power over different sub-channels and spatial streams. This allows the sender to respect the regulatory requirements but reduces the range of wide channels and multiple streams compared to narrow channels and single stream. Besides, the use of spatial multiplexing does not allow the receiver to take a full advantage of the diversity gain. This is another factor that reduces the range of Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) transmissions. So increasing the channel width and the number of spatial streams reduces the communication range significantly. Therefore, legacy 20 MHz channels with a single stream transmission may offer higher throughput than wide channels with multiple spatial streams. This affects the performance of rate adaptation algorithms. In this paper we introduce the power constraints that should be respected in WLANs and their impact on the range of 802.11n/ac data rates. We show that increasing the channel width and the number of spatial streams reduces the transmission range. Then we define a rate ordering scheme that selects the best data rates among those available. Our scheme intends to improve most rate adaptation algorithms, such as MinstrelHT. Finally we show, using simulation that our method enhances the throughput and the stability of MinstrelHT.

[1]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  Optimal Rate Sampling in 802.11 systems , 2013, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[2]  Mahesh K. Marina,et al.  SampleLite: A Hybrid Approach to 802.11n Link Adaptation , 2015, CCRV.

[3]  Lizhong Zheng,et al.  Diversity and multiplexing: a fundamental tradeoff in multiple-antenna channels , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  IEEE 802.11 rate adaptation: a practical approach , 2004, MSWiM '04.

[5]  Samiran Chattopadhyay,et al.  Impact of IEEE 802.11n/ac PHY/MAC High Throughput Enhancements over Transport/Application Layer Protocols - A Survey , 2017, ArXiv.

[6]  Adlen Ksentini,et al.  Performance Analysis of the TXOP Sharing Mechanism in the VHT IEEE 802.11ac WLANs , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  Mohamed Naimi,et al.  ETXOP: A resource allocation protocol for QoS-sensitive services provisioning in 802.11 networks , 2007, Perform. Evaluation.

[8]  Adão Silva,et al.  An Overview on Resource Allocation Techniques for Multi-User MIMO Systems , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.  A practical approach to rate adaptation for multi-antenna systems , 2011, 2011 19th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[10]  Samiran Chattopadhyay,et al.  Dynamic Link Adaptation in IEEE 802.11ac: A Distributed Learning Based Approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN).

[11]  Songwu Lu,et al.  MIMO rate adaptation in 802.11n wireless networks , 2010, MobiCom.

[12]  Tingpei Huang,et al.  RaCA: A joint rate and channel adaptation scheme for dense 802.11n networks , 2017 .

[13]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Switching between diversity and multiplexing in MIMO systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.