Transformational Sustainability Research Methodology

Sustainability science can roughly be differentiated into two distinct research streams – a “descriptive-analytical” and a “transformational” one. While the former is primarily concerned with describing and analyzing sustainability problems, the latter aims at developing evidence-supported solution options to solve these problems. This chapter presents relevant methodological guidelines and requirements as well as five exemplary research frameworks for transformational sustainability research. The frameworks are for (1) complex problem-handling, (2) transition management and governance, (3) backcasting, (4) integrated planning research, and (5) the transformational sustainability research (TRANSFORM framework). The TRANSFORM framework aims at synthesizing key components of the other frameworks. The frameworks provide guidelines for transformational sustainability research; yet, willingness and capacity of academic, governmental, private, and nonprofit organizations to use them for knowledge-generating operations are still fairly low. To truly support sustainability transformations, much more of this solution-oriented sustainability research is needed.

[1]  J. Spangenberg.  Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[3]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Robinson,et al.  Preventing childhood obesity: a solution-oriented research paradigm. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Mark W. Fraser,et al.  Intervention Research: Developing Social Programs , 2009 .

[7]  A. Weale.  Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2003 .

[8]  Jian-guo Wu,et al.  [What is sustainability science?]. , 2014, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[9]  David Kriebel,et al.  The Sustainability Solutions Agenda , 2012, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[10]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  User engagement in sustainability research , 2011 .

[11]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[12]  Y. Kajikawa.  Research core and framework of sustainability science , 2008 .

[13]  D. Loorbach.  Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework , 2010 .

[14]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Worth the trouble?!: An evaluative scheme for urban sustainability transition labs (USTLs) and an application to the USTL in Phoenix, Arizona , 2017 .

[15]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[16]  Dorien DeTombe,et al.  Climate change: a complex societal process; analyzing a problem according to the Compram methodology , 2008 .

[17]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Nanotechnology in the City: Sustainability Challenges and Anticipatory Governance , 2013 .

[18]  D. DeTombe,et al.  The COMPRAM Methodology and Complex Societal Problems-an Analysis of the Case of Children Born of War , 2010 .

[19]  Braden Kay.  Developing and Testing Transition Strategies for Urban Sustainability: Case Studies in Transition Research in Phoenix, Arizona , 2012 .

[20]  John Robinson,et al.  Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research , 2011 .

[21]  Pim Martens,et al.  Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[22]  Joe Ravetz,et al.  Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions , 2000 .

[23]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory , 2006 .

[24]  J. Magnuson,et al.  An integrated conceptual framework for long‐term social–ecological research , 2011 .

[25]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  John Holmberg,et al.  Backcasting: A Natural Step in Operationalising Sustainable Development(*) , 1998 .

[27]  John Robinson.  Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning , 2003 .

[28]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[29]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland) , 2010 .

[30]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Mitigating urban sprawl effects: a collaborative tree and shade intervention in Phoenix, Arizona, USA , 2016 .

[31]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[32]  Klaus Töpfer,et al.  The role of universities in fostering urban and regional sustainability , 2013 .

[33]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management , 2009 .

[34]  Anne Jerneck,et al.  Structuring sustainability science , 2011 .

[35]  John Robinson,et al.  The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis , 2004 .

[36]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Working Towards Sustainable Development in the Face of Uncertainty and Incomplete Knowledge , 2007 .

[37]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[38]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[39]  Dorien J. DeTombe,et al.  Compram, a Method for Handling Complex Societal Problems , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[41]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development , 2011 .

[42]  P. Vergragt,et al.  Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework , 2006 .

[43]  C. Geiger,et al.  Sustainability science in action: a review of the state of the field through case studies on disaster recovery, bioenergy, and precautionary purchasing , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[44]  P. Burger.  Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .