Tele-Impedance: Preliminary results on measuring and replicating human arm impedance in tele operated robots

This work introduces the concept of Tele-Impedance as a method for controlling/teleoperating a robotic arm in contact with the environment. Opposite to bilateral force-reflecting teleoperation control approach, which uses a position/velocity command combined with force feedback from the robot side, Tele-Impedance enriches the command sent to the slave robot by combining the position reference with a stiffness (or full impedance) reference. The desired stiffness profile is directly estimated from the arm of the human operating the remote robotic arm. We preliminarily investigate the effectiveness of this method while teleoperating a slave robotic arm to execute simple tasks. The KUKA light weight robotic arm is used as the slave manipulator. The endpoint (wrist) position of the human arm is monitored by an optical tracking system while the stiffness of the human arm is estimated from the electromyography (EMGs) signal measurements of four flexor-extensor muscle pairs, in realtime. The performance of Tele-Impedance control method is assessed by comparing the results obtained while executing a peg-in-hole task, with the slave arm under i) constant low stiffness, ii) constant high stiffness or iii) under Tele-Impedance control. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the Tele-Impedance control method and highlight its potential use to safely execute tasks with uncertain environment constraints which may result in large deviations from the commanded position trajectories.

[1]  H. Gomi,et al.  Task-Dependent Viscoelasticity of Human Multijoint Arm and Its Spatial Characteristics for Interaction with Environments , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A design framework for teleoperators with kinesthetic feedback , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A novel actuator with adjustable stiffness (AwAS) , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  K.J. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  EMG-based position and force control of a robot arm: Application to teleoperation and orthosis , 2007, 2007 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.

[7]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[8]  Wayne J. Book,et al.  Force reflecting teleoperation with adaptive impedance control , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[9]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Force-reflection and shared compliant control in operating telemanipulators with time delay , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  M. Kawato,et al.  A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Bruce A. Francis,et al.  Bilateral controller for teleoperators with time delay via μ-synthesis , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Rajiv V. Dubey,et al.  Variable damping impedance control of a bilateral telerobotic system , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Ground-space bilateral teleoperation of ETS-VII robot arm by direct bilateral coupling under 7-s time delay condition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  G. Schreiber,et al.  The Fast Research Interface for the KUKA Lightweight Robot , 2022 .

[15]  Mark L. Nagurka,et al.  Dynamic and loaded impedance components in the maintenance of human arm posture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Telemanipulation with Time Delays , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Experimental and simulation studies of hard contact in force reflecting teleoperation , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[23]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[25]  Claudio Melchiorri,et al.  Force reflecting telemanipulators with time-delay: stability analysis and control design , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[26]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[27]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The DLR lightweight robot: design and control concepts for robots in human environments , 2007, Ind. Robot.