The Mental Timeline in a Crossed-Hands Paradigm.

The existence of a lateral mental timeline is well established; in left-to-right writing cultures, past is associated with the left, future with the right. Accordingly, participants respond faster with the left to past, and with the right to future. Recent studies indicate that this association does not reverse when participants respond with their hands crossed. We investigated the role of instruction for this association in a crossed-hands paradigm. Participants classified the temporal reference of words by pressing a key on the left with their right hand, or a key on the right with their left. Half of the participants were instructed to respond with their right or left hand; the other half were instructed to respond with the left or right key. An interaction between time and key showed only for participants instructed to respond with the key, providing support for the role of extracorporal space for the mental timeline.

[1]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M. Masson.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  Andreas B. Eder,et al.  When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses , 2011, Brain and Language.

[6]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Barbara Kaup,et al.  Keep your hands crossed: the valence-by-left/right interaction is related to hand, not side, in an incongruent hand-response key assignment. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[8]  B. Hommel.  Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[9]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Response mode does not modulate the space-time congruency effect: evidence for a space-time mapping at a conceptual level. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Marc Ouellet,et al.  Is the future the right time? , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[11]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General © 2009 American Psychological Association , 2022 .

[12]  D. Lakens,et al.  Can Conceptual Congruency Effects between Number, Time, and Space Be Accounted for by Polarity Correspondence? Acta Psychologica , 2022 .

[13]  S. Grondin,et al.  From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Hemispatial Neglect Shows That “Before” Is “Left” , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[16]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect , 2003, Psychological research.

[17]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Crossed Hands and the Snarc Effect: Afailure to Replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993) , 2006, Cortex.

[18]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[19]  R. Ulrich,et al.  With the past behind and the future ahead: Back-to-front representation of past and future sentences , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left-right axis? , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Left–right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing , 2010, Cognition.

[22]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time Onto Spatial Frames of Reference , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Orly Fuhrman,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[25]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[26]  Yang Seok Cho,et al.  Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Time (also) flies from left to right , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Space and time in the sighted and blind , 2015, Cognition.