TRM3 is a device and range performance model for modern thermal imagers with their numerous possible design features. The TRM3 computer program contains two different device models: The Conventional Approach model and the TRM3 Approach model. In the Conventional Approach model, the assumptions are similar to FLIR92. The TRM3 Approach model uses different assumptions in case of fixed pattern noise and of undersampled systems. If the imager is undersampled, an MTDP (Minimum Temperature Difference Perceived) is calculated, rather than an MRTD. This MTDP is used to predict the range performance of undersampled imagers. With the new approach, significantly higher ranges are predicted than those expected with FLIR92. The problem in assessing undersampled thermal imagers with the standard 4-bar test pattern is shortly described. The new approaches in the TRM3 Approach model are outlined and discussed. Examples of measured and predicted MTDP data as well as range data are given. Finally, a short introduction to the TRM3 computer program is given.
[1]
Luke Scott.
Application of 3D noise to MRTD prediction
,
1992,
Infrared Information Symposia.
[2]
Wolfgang Wittenstein,et al.
Range performance of two staring imagers: presentation of the field trial and data analysis
,
1996,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[3]
John A. D'Agostino,et al.
Three-dimensional analysis framework and measurement methodology for imaging system noise
,
1991,
Defense, Security, and Sensing.
[4]
J. C. Fontanella,et al.
The Definition of the OTF and the Measurement of Aliasing for Sampled Imaging Systems
,
1982
.
[5]
Wolfgang Wittenstein.
Performance prediction and experimental assessment of advanced thermal imagers
,
1994,
Optics & Photonics.
[6]
Wolfgang Wittenstein,et al.
Simulation study on fixed pattern noise and MRTD
,
1995,
Optics & Photonics.