Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking.

The objective of this study was to identify structural and functional factors which are predictors of peak pressure underneath the human foot during walking. Peak plantar pressure during walking and eight data sets of structural and functional measures were collected on 55 asymptomatic subjects between 20 and 70 yr. A best subset regression approach was used to establish models which predicted peak regional pressure under the foot. Potential predictor variables were chosen from physical characteristics, anthropometric data, passive range of motion (PROM), measurements from standardized weight bearing foot radiographs, mechanical properties of the plantar soft tissue, stride parameters, foot motion in 3D, and EMG during walking. Peak pressure values under the rearfoot, midfoot, MTH1, and hallux were measured. Heel pressure was a function of linear kinematics, longitudinal arch structure, thickness of plantar soft tissue, and age. Midfoot pressure prediction was dominated by arch structure, while MTH1 pressure was a function of radiographic measurements, talo-crural joint motion, and gastrocnemius activity. Hallux pressure was a function of structural measures and MTP1 joint motion. Foot structure and function predicted only approximately 50% of the variance in peak pressure, although the relative contributions in different anatomical regions varied dramatically. Structure was dominant in predicting peak pressure under the midfoot and MTH1, while both structure and function were important at the heel and hallux. The predictive models developed in this study give insight into potential etiological factors associated with elevated plantar pressure. They also provide direction for future studies designed to reduce elevated pressure in "at-risk" patients.

[1]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion , 1994 .

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  What role does plantar soft tissue stiffness play in determining peak pressure under the heel , 1997 .

[3]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Reliability of Standard Foot Radiographic Measurements , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  M. Rodgers Dynamic foot biomechanics. , 1995, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[5]  J. Giurini,et al.  Tendo Achillis procedures for chronic ulcerations in diabetic patients with transmetatarsal amputations. , 1993, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[6]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Influence of Extrinsic Plantar Flexors on Forefoot Loading During Heel Rise , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  M. L. Root,et al.  Normal and abnormal function of the foot , 1977 .

[8]  C. Grunfeld,et al.  Heel pad thickness: determination by high‐resolution ultrasonography. , 1985, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  M. Jahss,et al.  Investigations into the Fat Pads of the Sole of the Foot: Heel Pressure Studies , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[10]  U. Jørgensen,et al.  The HPC-Device: A Method to Quantify the Heel Pad Shock Absorbency , 1989, Foot & ankle.

[11]  M. Rodgers Plantar pressure distribution measurement during barefoot walking : normal values and predictive equations , 1986 .

[12]  M I Root,et al.  Biomechanical examination of the foot. , 1973, Journal of the American Podiatry Association.

[13]  R. Minns,et al.  Pressure under the forefoot in rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of static and dynamic methods of assessment. , 1984, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Body Mass is a Poor Predictor of Peak Plantar Pressure in Diabetic Men , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[15]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd ed.). , 1992 .

[16]  D. Grieve,et al.  The relationships between length of stride, step frequency, time of swing and speed of walking for children and adults. , 1966, Ergonomics.

[17]  D W Grieve,et al.  The assessment of gait. , 1969, Physiotherapy.

[18]  V T Inman,et al.  The Human Foot , 1944, Manitoba medical review.

[19]  P. Aerts,et al.  The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: an in vivo cineradiographic study. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  A. Veves,et al.  Relationship of Limited Joint Mobility to Abnormal Foot Pressures and Diabetic Foot Ulceration , 1991, Diabetes Care.

[22]  M. Myerson,et al.  The pathological anatomy of claw and hammer toes. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  C. I. Franks,et al.  Dynamic Foot Pressure and Other Studies as Diagnostic and Management Aids in Diabetic Neuropathy , 1983, Diabetes Care.

[24]  M. G. Fox The Effect of Shortness of the First Metatarsal Bone on Foot Function , 1950 .

[25]  E. Morag,et al.  The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Radiographic Measurements of the Normal Adult Foot , 1980, Foot & ankle.

[27]  McMahon Ta Gravitational scale effects. , 1979 .

[28]  E. Morag,et al.  Structural and functional aspects of the diabetic foot. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[29]  C I Franks,et al.  Plantar pressure measurements and the prevention of ulceration in the diabetic foot. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.