The nature of face representations in subcortical regions

Studies examining the neural correlates of face perception in humans have focused almost exclusively on the distributed cortical network of face-selective regions. Recently, however, investigations have also identified subcortical correlates of face perception and the question addressed here concerns the nature of these subcortical face representations. To explore this issue, we presented to participants pairs of images sequentially to the same or to different eyes. Superior performance in the former over latter condition implicates monocular, prestriate portions of the visual system. Over a series of five experiments, we manipulated both lower-level (size, location) as well as higher-level (identity) similarity across the pair of faces. A monocular advantage was observed even when the faces in a pair differed in location and in size, implicating some subcortical invariance across lower-level image properties. A monocular advantage was also observed when the faces in a pair were two different images of the same individual, indicating the engagement of subcortical representations in more abstract, higher-level aspects of face processing. We conclude that subcortical structures of the visual system are involved, perhaps interactively, in multiple aspects of face perception, and not simply in deriving initial coarse representations.

[1]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Tibbetts Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  A monocular, unconscious form of visual attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Segev,et al.  Inhibition of return in the archer fish , 2013, Nature Communications.

[7]  Elizabeth A. Tibbetts,et al.  Specialized Face Learning Is Associated with Individual Recognition in Paper Wasps , 2011, Science.

[8]  Mark H. Johnson Subcortical face processing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Philipp Sterzer,et al.  Rapid Fear Detection Relies on High Spatial Frequencies , 2014, Psychological science.

[10]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Kurt E. Weaver,et al.  fMRI evidence of neural abnormalities in the subcortical face processing system in ASD , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Neuronal responses in visual area V2 (V2) of macaque monkeys with strabismic amblyopia. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  F M de Monasterio,et al.  Arrangement of ocular dominance columns in human visual cortex. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Impact of signal-to-noise on functional MRI of the human amygdala , 2001, Neuroreport.

[18]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Parietal Lobe Lesions Disrupt Saccadic Remapping of Inhibitory Location Tagging , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Multiple Reference Frames for Saccadic Planning in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Thomaz,et al.  A new ranking method for principal components analysis and its application to face image analysis , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[22]  A. Martínez,et al.  The AR face databasae , 1998 .

[23]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Ocular dominance in human V1 demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Knowing with Which Eye We See: Utrocular Discrimination and Eye-Specific Signals in Human Visual Cortex , 2010, PloS one.

[25]  Jon H. Kaas,et al.  Pulvinar contributions to the dorsal and ventral streams of visual processing in primates , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[26]  N. Issa,et al.  Subcortical Representation of Non-Fourier Image Features , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Monocular Advantage for Face Perception Implicates Subcortical Mechanisms in Adult Humans , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[31]  R. Blake,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a monocular visual cortex in stereoblind humans. , 1979, Science.

[32]  C. Gross,et al.  Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. II. Effects of superior colliculus removal , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[34]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Spatial shifts of audio-visual interactions by perceptual learning are specific to the trained orientation and eye. , 2011, Seeing and perceiving.

[35]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Subcortical human face processing? Evidence from masked priming. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Visual predictions in the orbitofrontal cortex rely on associative content. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Pamela M. Pallett,et al.  Special Issue Linking Hypotheses in Visual Neuroscience: a Tribute to Davida Teller Development of Face Discrimination Abilities, and Relationship to Magnocellular Pathway Development, between Childhood and Adulthood , 2022 .

[38]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, Current Biology.

[39]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database , 2010 .

[40]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[41]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Robust Selectivity for Faces in the Human Amygdala in the Absence of Expressions , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  M. Bar,et al.  Magnocellular Projections as the Trigger of Top-Down Facilitation in Recognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  V. Casagrande,et al.  Demonstration of ipsilateral retinocollicular projections in the tree shrew (Tupaia glis) , 1985, Brain Research.

[44]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[45]  Syed A. Rizvi,et al.  The FERET Evaluation , 1998 .

[46]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[47]  Harry Wechsler,et al.  The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..